Guest wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 4:34 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 4:09 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 9:50 am
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 9:11 am
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 9:01 am
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 8:59 am
Can someone just make a new post called 2016 MD/Rep do we can move on from this garbage and just chat about the hockey teams?
How dare you insult the ELITES!!!!
For real. MD is house league compared to Klevr Elite Deluxe AAA Invite Only.
My kids in Klevr. We aren't all douche bags.
Kids are more or less equally talented across the board. The game is different, of course. Full ice, vs half ice. Big nets, vs Small nets. Offsides and Icing, vs not.
The conversation can still be combined and not filled with asshats who want to tease everyone because the word "elite" or AAA was used.
You're definitely not douche bags. (maybe except for the Montreal Kings) I have a ton of friends that bought into the KSL pitch. Some regret it already and some are happy with their choice.
That said, full ice at 2016 is just dumb. How much research do people need to slapped with before they clue in?? It's bad for the two or three kids that skate end to end and it's bad for the kids that never get touches.
While I would agree with this 5 years ago, it is rare/doesn't happen with the real good kids. No one is going end to end in a good game that I've Seen (and I've seen a lot of full ice games for 2016/2017). It's not just KSL teams that are doing full ice (it's just not advertised openly). Half ice is a joke to these kids now, they all play spring hockey full ice now anyways. Again, the kids at 2016 (call them elite, call them a joke, call them whatever) seem to me anyways, to be way ahead of the 2014/15 ages.
The ksl was formed because most agree that half ice is a joke. Looks like business is fine there so obviously the ppl have spoken on the issue of full vs half. Everyone was doing underground games anyways at the KSL just made sense.
The point is, by the time the kids are U10 they will know how to play in systems, back check, avoid offsides, avoid Icing the puck, change lines on the fly, goalies playing in full size nets, look for long leed passes etc etc.
None of those things by themselves are a huge advantage. But all of those things, combined with playing mostly good, competitive games, are going to prep these kids better than half ice and 4 on 4.
Then layer in the fact that a lot of these kids either play spring hockey doing full ice, or lacrosse which is fall "pad" with all of those things (line changes, real rules, etc) I am not sure kids would adjust back to the half ice, small nets, non-sense.
HOWEVER, after saying all that, I get why some people think half ice is better. I could be sold on some of the main points.
It's like NFL vs CFL same sport, different rules.