A new place to talk about minor hockey in North America & Around the World. Jump in to the Minor Hockey Talk forum and discuss everything about Hockey in Canada & Hockey in the USA
Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 06, 2023 6:27 pm
Its sad how old AMHA board members are coming on here because they were not part of the huge success Pickering brought to the new ARPMHA.
I counted up the championships last year from APR .. oh, didn't get to one. Success?
A lot of people measure success of a youth organization by the number of kids they have enrolled and in hockey by the number of rep teams, particularly competitive rep teams, they can put on the ice. How'd you do there? Given the answer is now zero I'd say not to well.
But by all means keep reveling in championships at the oldest levels where all the good players have moved onto better tiers of hockey or chosen to focus on their studies to make a better life for themselves. But I'm sure it was all by design, have them all get their asses kicked for 10 years then when other town's kids quit and some kids who abandoned ship early come back you got a shot (especiailly if you sandbag at the A level). You were a joke and that's why you don't exist anymore. GFY.
Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 06, 2023 6:27 pm
Its sad how old AMHA board members are coming on here because they were not part of the huge success Pickering brought to the new ARPMHA.
I counted up the championships last year from APR .. oh, didn't get to one. Success?
A lot of people measure success of a youth organization by the number of kids they have enrolled and in hockey by the number of rep teams, particularly competitive rep teams, they can put on the ice. How'd you do there? Given the answer is now zero I'd say not to well.
But by all means keep reveling in championships at the oldest levels where all the good players have moved onto better tiers of hockey or chosen to focus on their studies to make a better life for themselves. But I'm sure it was all by design, have them all get their asses kicked for 10 years then when other town's kids quit and some kids who abandoned ship early come back you got a shot (especiailly if you sandbag at the A level). You were a joke and that's why you don't exist anymore. GFY.
The question I have as an Ajax resident, did the Ajax board or a portion of the Ajax board not simply move to the APR Board? In any hockey merger like this one, APR Board should take 30-40% of the AMHA Board. What really happened?
Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 06, 2023 6:27 pm
Its sad how old AMHA board members are coming on here because they were not part of the huge success Pickering brought to the new ARPMHA.
I counted up the championships last year from APR .. oh, didn't get to one. Success?
A lot of people measure success of a youth organization by the number of kids they have enrolled and in hockey by the number of rep teams, particularly competitive rep teams, they can put on the ice. How'd you do there? Given the answer is now zero I'd say not to well.
But by all means keep reveling in championships at the oldest levels where all the good players have moved onto better tiers of hockey or chosen to focus on their studies to make a better life for themselves. But I'm sure it was all by design, have them all get their asses kicked for 10 years then when other town's kids quit and some kids who abandoned ship early come back you got a shot (especiailly if you sandbag at the A level). You were a joke and that's why you don't exist anymore. GFY.
The question I have as an Ajax resident, did the Ajax board or a portion of the Ajax board not simply move to the APR Board? In any hockey merger like this one, APR Board should take 30-40% of the AMHA Board. What really happened?
The person continuing to push the "excellence" of AMHA is bar none the greatest troll on this site. And I for one am here for it. Incredible work.
Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 06, 2023 6:27 pm
Its sad how old AMHA board members are coming on here because they were not part of the huge success Pickering brought to the new ARPMHA.
I counted up the championships last year from APR .. oh, didn't get to one. Success?
A lot of people measure success of a youth organization by the number of kids they have enrolled and in hockey by the number of rep teams, particularly competitive rep teams, they can put on the ice. How'd you do there? Given the answer is now zero I'd say not to well.
But by all means keep reveling in championships at the oldest levels where all the good players have moved onto better tiers of hockey or chosen to focus on their studies to make a better life for themselves. But I'm sure it was all by design, have them all get their asses kicked for 10 years then when other town's kids quit and some kids who abandoned ship early come back you got a shot (especiailly if you sandbag at the A level). You were a joke and that's why you don't exist anymore. GFY.
The question I have as an Ajax resident, did the Ajax board or a portion of the Ajax board not simply move to the APR Board? In any hockey merger like this one, APR Board should take 30-40% of the AMHA Board. What really happened?
The person continuing to push the "excellence" of AMHA is bar none the greatest troll on this site. And I for one am here for it. Incredible work.
What is disappointing is no 'legacy' built within the confines Don Beer and/or Ajax Community Centre of the AMHA. So many organizations do a great job of preserving kids, teams, championships, builders and this seems not to exist with APR. AMHA is a big reason APR has a foundation to build upon.
Guest wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2023 7:40 am
What is disappointing is no 'legacy' built within the confines Don Beer and/or Ajax Community Centre of the AMHA. So many organizations do a great job of preserving kids, teams, championships, builders and this seems not to exist with APR. AMHA is a big reason APR has a foundation to build upon.
Again, why the crying all the time around Ajax hockey? It just never ends.
Guest wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2023 7:40 am
What is disappointing is no 'legacy' built within the confines Don Beer and/or Ajax Community Centre of the AMHA. So many organizations do a great job of preserving kids, teams, championships, builders and this seems not to exist with APR. AMHA is a big reason APR has a foundation to build upon.
All I have to say is "parents dont pick coaches not now not ever", was written on the back of the AMHA tomb stone.
Guest wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2023 7:40 am
What is disappointing is no 'legacy' built within the confines Don Beer and/or Ajax Community Centre of the AMHA. So many organizations do a great job of preserving kids, teams, championships, builders and this seems not to exist with APR. AMHA is a big reason APR has a foundation to build upon.
All I have to say is "parents dont pick coaches not now not ever", was written on the back of the AMHA tomb stone.
Lmao isn't that pretty much exactly what happened with the 2013 APR team? Parents didn't like the coach, held out, they fired him and named the guy they wanted.
He called this happening back in 2018