Hamilton Huskies

Guest

Re: Hamilton Huskies

Post by Guest »

Glenn123 wrote: Mon Dec 05, 2022 3:35 pm
Guest wrote: Sun Oct 02, 2022 7:37 pm I have heard that the 2009 squad is looking good.
Looking good? Hahaha that made me laugh! Last place in the division with a -38 goals against. They are ripping it up! Honestly what did they expect when selecting imports from the Burlington who are weak on BE's 3rd line
forgot to mention 3 Halton cuts
Guest

Re: Hamilton Huskies

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Mon Sep 26, 2022 9:08 pm Only Huskies team with any hope in hell of making a go of it are the 2012’s and the 2013’s.
i think you are referring to the 2011s and 2012s lol the 13's are ranked 25th in the province (worst huskies team) and half the kids cant skate . AA TEAM AT BEST
Guest

Re: Hamilton Huskies

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Wed Dec 07, 2022 9:36 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 26, 2022 9:08 pm Only Huskies team with any hope in hell of making a go of it are the 2012’s and the 2013’s.
i think you are referring to the 2011s and 2012s lol the 13's are ranked 25th in the province (worst huskies team) and half the kids cant skate . AA TEAM AT BEST
The 2012s just got smoked in the bulldogs tournament by the 5th place GTHL team so they are no better. Only look good against bad teams. The kids work hard just no top end talent. Not sure about 2011s
Guest

Re: Hamilton Huskies

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Wed Dec 07, 2022 11:06 am
Guest wrote: Wed Dec 07, 2022 9:36 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 26, 2022 9:08 pm Only Huskies team with any hope in hell of making a go of it are the 2012’s and the 2013’s.
i think you are referring to the 2011s and 2012s lol the 13's are ranked 25th in the province (worst huskies team) and half the kids cant skate . AA TEAM AT BEST
The 2012s just got smoked in the bulldogs tournament by the 5th place GTHL team so they are no better. Only look good against bad teams. The kids work hard just no top end talent. Not sure about 2011s
They're just happy to be ahead of brantford this year :lol:
Huskies

Re: Hamilton Huskies

Post by Huskies »

Guest wrote: Wed Dec 07, 2022 9:36 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 26, 2022 9:08 pm Only Huskies team with any hope in hell of making a go of it are the 2012’s and the 2013’s.
i think you are referring to the 2011s and 2012s lol the 13's are ranked 25th in the province (worst huskies team) and half the kids cant skate . AA TEAM AT BEST
Give your head a shake - the 13’s just beat a bunch of top 15 teams in the Jr Bulldogs tournament and went right through to the finals. There is some top end talent on that team - especially with their 3 key D-men. They will start to climb the rankings - top 15 by the end of January.
Guest

Re: Hamilton Huskies

Post by Guest »

Huskies wrote: Wed Dec 07, 2022 7:19 pm
Guest wrote: Wed Dec 07, 2022 9:36 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 26, 2022 9:08 pm Only Huskies team with any hope in hell of making a go of it are the 2012’s and the 2013’s.
i think you are referring to the 2011s and 2012s lol the 13's are ranked 25th in the province (worst huskies team) and half the kids cant skate . AA TEAM AT BEST
Give your head a shake - the 13’s just beat a bunch of top 15 teams in the Jr Bulldogs tournament and went right through to the finals. There is some top end talent on that team - especially with their 3 key D-men. They will start to climb the rankings - top 15 by the end of January.

I just checked. The 2013s lost 8-3 to the 5th place Toronto team that has a .500 record in the GTHL. That’s impressive? The defence got eaten alive so not sure what game you saw. Rankings also showed a 18-0 loss to little Caesar’s a month ago and several losses by 3-4 goals. That’s the D you bragging about? What a joke. The highest ranked team you beat in the tournament was 13th and has a losing record of 11 wins and 13 losses. I wouldn’t be talking if I were you but guess we’ll see where you are in 2 months.
My son is a 2012 and we lost 5-2 to a 5th place GTHL team too. I’m just not dumb enough to talk about how good we are after getting our asses kicked, we’ll focus on getting better. You should too.
Guest

Re: Hamilton Huskies

Post by Guest »

Top 3 key Dman 😂😂😂😂😂. Lost 18-0 lol
Guest

Re: Hamilton Huskies

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Sun Oct 02, 2022 7:37 pm I have heard that the 2009 squad is looking good.
this site is a joke
what team have you been watching
Guest

Re: Hamilton Huskies

Post by Guest »

The 2011 team is decent. Top in their division. The only other good team is EMC. London has regressed under the same coach. Waterloo is struggling as well. Huron improved. Windsor also improved. Still, there are really only 2 good teams out of all the 2011 Alliance teams. The rest are weak.
Huskie guy

Re: Hamilton Huskies

Post by Huskie guy »

It's a hard spot to be in, seeing how pathetic you people are for chirping 9 yr old kids , while trying my best not to become one of you. But to compare a city alliance team to a stacked little Caesars team is just not reasonable. How have they done against high end GTHL teams? No need to answer
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “2004 And Younger”