London Jr Knights

Guest

Re: London Jr Knights

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Mon Dec 12, 2022 3:17 pm How many qualified people do you think apply every year? 25-100-1000?

Now how many qualified non parent people apply every year to spend hundreds of hours, burn vacation days for non family weekends and potentially listen to baseless complaints from upset parents all for 2-5k?
It is up to the board to make it attractive ($) to be a non-parent coach.
Guest

Re: London Jr Knights

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Mon Dec 12, 2022 5:30 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Dec 12, 2022 3:17 pm How many qualified people do you think apply every year? 25-100-1000?

Now how many qualified non parent people apply every year to spend hundreds of hours, burn vacation days for non family weekends and potentially listen to baseless complaints from upset parents all for 2-5k?
It is up to the board to make it attractive ($) to be a non-parent coach.
Sure so lets say for s and g's give each coach 10k and their 2 asst coaches 5k each and trainer 2500....bc no parent should be on the bench to influence any decisions on players or ice time ...you know to make it fair

Now there is $22500 to cover off in your budget and you have not hit the ice yet. You think parents complain when they fees go up $200-300 a year...try north of $1750 per player

It is not as easy as throwing money at it ...if it was we would have no issues in anything
Guest

Re: London Jr Knights

Post by Guest »

How come EMC is so much better than LJK?
Guest

Re: London Jr Knights

Post by Guest »

Some LJK teams won’t take f1 kids, others will. Emc will.

Emc is becoming like LJK. Alot of board members in emc are parents.

LJK has money in the bank to pay coaches at the higher age levels. Do it for minor bantam and up for paid non parent bench staff.
Guest

Re: London Jr Knights

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Mon Dec 12, 2022 6:54 pm Some LJK teams won’t take f1 kids, others will. Emc will.

Emc is becoming like LJK. Alot of board members in emc are parents.

LJK has money in the bank to pay coaches at the higher age levels. Do it for minor bantam and up for paid non parent bench staff.
Ahhhh pretty much every hockey board has parents on it and you usually cease to have "money in the bank" when you spend it
Guest

Re: London Jr Knights

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Mon Dec 12, 2022 8:04 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Dec 12, 2022 6:54 pm Some LJK teams won’t take f1 kids, others will. Emc will.

Emc is becoming like LJK. Alot of board members in emc are parents.

LJK has money in the bank to pay coaches at the higher age levels. Do it for minor bantam and up for paid non parent bench staff.
Ahhhh pretty much every hockey board has parents on it and you usually cease to have "money in the bank" when you spend it
Brilliant observation you moron
Guest

Re: London Jr Knights

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Wed Dec 14, 2022 9:50 am
Guest wrote: Mon Dec 12, 2022 8:04 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Dec 12, 2022 6:54 pm Some LJK teams won’t take f1 kids, others will. Emc will.

Emc is becoming like LJK. Alot of board members in emc are parents.

LJK has money in the bank to pay coaches at the higher age levels. Do it for minor bantam and up for paid non parent bench staff.
Ahhhh pretty much every hockey board has parents on it and you usually cease to have "money in the bank" when you spend it
Brilliant observation you moron
Gee I guess you were not able to get on the board....maybe run for equipment guy next time
Guest

Re: London Jr Knights

Post by Guest »

With confirmed spring tryouts- let’s see when LJK asks for coach applicants.

Who will keep their teams and who will change up.
Guest

Re: London Jr Knights

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Thu Dec 29, 2022 9:06 am With confirmed spring tryouts- let’s see when LJK asks for coach applicants.

Who will keep their teams and who will change up.
From what I've heard the board can't wait to get rid of the U12 guy. Heard whisperings of a new coach for the U14 team and big player movements.
Guest

Re: London Jr Knights

Post by Guest »

U13aa huge conflict of interest have a coach to lazy to run a second practice and so they play 2 on 2 at a parents busy instead of a 2nd practice that team is getting less practice ice time the md teams

Ljk is a joke
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “2004 And Younger”