There's no argument here bud...just your unwillingness to describe how you think this team broke the rule. Things would go a lot smoother is you'd simply start by tell us how many players you think were were on their bench.Guest wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 5:22 pm Even with the rule in front of you you continue to argue. Bush league. Pathetic. Have a great time convincing yourself you are correct and your coach acted in an ethical manner. The Ducks you 47 chromosomes fool......chirp.
Given what I've seen over the years, I find it hard to believe that the league wouldn't make good on the policy. I've seen it happen in AAA, where a player (from US) came late to the league and signed a card, but the team dressed him before his card had been processed. They won the game, but a few days later the win was converted to a 1-0 loss . I've also seen a AA team dress a kid who somehow signed a card for a team in the O, as well as a team in the G (2 teams). They were a first place G team, but once this was discovered they lost all their points and 14 games were converted to 1-0 losses. Another team somehow lost a player card, and was unaware until a tourney organizer brought it to the coaches attention. The coach removed himself while the situation was under review, pending the possibility of a fairly length suspension. The league let it go and chalked it up to an administrative error, as the kid was a returning player and there are no outstanding fees. In these situations, the coaches are penalized 3 game per 1 game played by the ineligible player.