Minor Hockey Talks - Hockey Forum

Guest wrote: ↑Sun May 05, 2024 2:44 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sun May 05, 2024 2:16 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sun May 05, 2024 2:12 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sun May 05, 2024 11:29 am

Guest wrote: ↑Sun May 05, 2024 8:03 am

Guest wrote: ↑Sun May 05, 2024 7:03 am How did either u16 u18 get asked back- no one was happy with either.

Consider the parent groups and I can understand why

The parent groups both hated the coaches.
Half the u18 team sat.
Great minor hockey development model.
This was not a secret - u18 should have been removed but the corrupt board wanted the corrupt u18 coach again.

The 07 group have been a disaster since day 1

Great idea!
Pair a douchebag coach with a douchebag team!
What could go wrong?

Lotta haters on here, the amount of disrespect spewed on this website is astounding. Good thing the u18s will move on this year. Let’s vote on the next age group to get smashed on MHL, shall we?

The team moves on but the douchebag coach gets to milk another 25000 from emc sitting kids and feeding his massive ego. Plus whatever he gets from his backroom deals .

Guest wrote: ↑Sun May 05, 2024 3:10 pm The team moves on but the douchebag coach gets to milk another 25000 from emc sitting kids and feeding his massive ego. Plus whatever he gets from his backroom deals .

So the suggestion is each player (all 20 of them) had to shell out and EXTRA $1250 on top of everything else like the usual expenses (hotel, mileage, food...) and this was not agreed upon in the team budget meeting which as per the Constitution states:

A Team Budget must have 2/3 approval of their team and must submit the budget to the Board for approval at the 1st Board meeting in September.

If not, it reads like you have a fantastic case with lots of evidence to take forward.....of course you could also have little to no evidence and just have an axe to grind but why would someone even post something online that was perhaps not true

Guest wrote: ↑Sun May 05, 2024 3:33 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sun May 05, 2024 3:10 pm The team moves on but the douchebag coach gets to milk another 25000 from emc sitting kids and feeding his massive ego. Plus whatever he gets from his backroom deals .

So the suggestion is each player (all 20 of them) had to shell out and EXTRA $1250 on top of everything else like the usual expenses (hotel, mileage, food...) and this was not agreed upon in the team budget meeting which as per the Constitution states:

A Team Budget must have 2/3 approval of their team and must submit the budget to the Board for approval at the 1st Board meeting in September.

If not, it reads like you have a fantastic case with lots of evidence to take forward.....of course you could also have little to no evidence and just have an axe to grind but why would someone even post something online that was perhaps not true

Easy to get 2/3 vote at the start of the season. This is long before he started sitting half the team. And look at the record - made no difference. The sitting kids might not have minded if the team actually won.

Guest wrote: ↑Sun May 05, 2024 4:08 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sun May 05, 2024 3:33 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sun May 05, 2024 3:10 pm The team moves on but the douchebag coach gets to milk another 25000 from emc sitting kids and feeding his massive ego. Plus whatever he gets from his backroom deals .

So the suggestion is each player (all 20 of them) had to shell out and EXTRA $1250 on top of everything else like the usual expenses (hotel, mileage, food...) and this was not agreed upon in the team budget meeting which as per the Constitution states:

A Team Budget must have 2/3 approval of their team and must submit the budget to the Board for approval at the 1st Board meeting in September.

If not, it reads like you have a fantastic case with lots of evidence to take forward.....of course you could also have little to no evidence and just have an axe to grind but why would someone even post something online that was perhaps not true

Easy to get 2/3 vote at the start of the season. This is long before he started sitting half the team. And look at the record - made no difference. The sitting kids might not have minded if the team actually won.

Sitting kids regularly should not happen. It’s more a reflection of the coach than the kids, they made the team they should be part of the lineup. I’d suggest addressing the issue directly with a trusted board member, and staying away from this slanderous website.

Guest wrote: ↑Sun May 05, 2024 4:08 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sun May 05, 2024 3:33 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sun May 05, 2024 3:10 pm The team moves on but the douchebag coach gets to milk another 25000 from emc sitting kids and feeding his massive ego. Plus whatever he gets from his backroom deals .

So the suggestion is each player (all 20 of them) had to shell out and EXTRA $1250 on top of everything else like the usual expenses (hotel, mileage, food...) and this was not agreed upon in the team budget meeting which as per the Constitution states:

A Team Budget must have 2/3 approval of their team and must submit the budget to the Board for approval at the 1st Board meeting in September.

If not, it reads like you have a fantastic case with lots of evidence to take forward.....of course you could also have little to no evidence and just have an axe to grind but why would someone even post something online that was perhaps not true

Easy to get 2/3 vote at the start of the season. This is long before he started sitting half the team. And look at the record - made no difference. The sitting kids might not have minded if the team actually won.

Sitting kids regularly should not happen. It’s more a reflection of the coach than the kids, they made the team they should be part of the lineup. I’d suggest addressing the issue directly with a trusted board member, and staying away from this slanderous website.

Guest wrote: ↑Sun May 05, 2024 4:26 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sun May 05, 2024 4:08 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sun May 05, 2024 3:33 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sun May 05, 2024 3:10 pm The team moves on but the douchebag coach gets to milk another 25000 from emc sitting kids and feeding his massive ego. Plus whatever he gets from his backroom deals .

So the suggestion is each player (all 20 of them) had to shell out and EXTRA $1250 on top of everything else like the usual expenses (hotel, mileage, food...) and this was not agreed upon in the team budget meeting which as per the Constitution states:

A Team Budget must have 2/3 approval of their team and must submit the budget to the Board for approval at the 1st Board meeting in September.

If not, it reads like you have a fantastic case with lots of evidence to take forward.....of course you could also have little to no evidence and just have an axe to grind but why would someone even post something online that was perhaps not true

Easy to get 2/3 vote at the start of the season. This is long before he started sitting half the team. And look at the record - made no difference. The sitting kids might not have minded if the team actually won.

Sitting kids regularly should not happen. It’s more a reflection of the coach than the kids, they made the team they should be part of the lineup. I’d suggest addressing the issue directly with a trusted board member, and staying away from this slanderous website.

“Trusted board member “
Thats rich
If the board had any “trusted “ members - a low life would never have been selected to coach in our org.

Guest wrote: ↑Sun May 05, 2024 6:45 pm Sitting kids regularly should not happen. It’s more a reflection of the coach than the kids, they made the team they should be part of the lineup. I’d suggest addressing the issue directly with a trusted board member, and staying away from this slanderous website.

The yr with the 05 and 6's no one complained about much....they were winning.... then you add in the 07's an historically below avg group and people start moaning.