2015 AAA

Guest

Re: 2015 AAA

Post by Guest »

would
Guest

Re: 2015 AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 4:13 pm
Guest wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 9:05 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2024 10:29 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2024 10:27 pm Sens will finish second last. TT will pass them by end of season, you heard it here first.
TT is better than them today bud.
TT might be better but they had to pay to have kids on that team. Most kids got a free ride on TT.
how do you know this? smells like bs.
It’s not. Moneybags team. Not sure about this year’s roster but next year a free ride is hard to resist.
Guest

Re: 2015 AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Wed Oct 02, 2024 8:25 am
Guest wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 4:13 pm
Guest wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 9:05 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2024 10:29 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2024 10:27 pm Sens will finish second last. TT will pass them by end of season, you heard it here first.
TT is better than them today bud.
TT might be better but they had to pay to have kids on that team. Most kids got a free ride on TT.
how do you know this? smells like bs.
It’s not. Moneybags team. Not sure about this year’s roster but next year a free ride is hard to resist.
Rumours with no justification are great.
Guest

Re: 2015 AAA

Post by Guest »

It's probably the opposite. Committed parent group heavily committed to getting better and keeping a good group of kids together. They are all probably paying more as a result. Haters are going to hate, and if there's a parent who's willing and able to donate his time and money on top of all that... it's not a bad thing. Can't take it with you!
Guest

Re: 2015 AAA

Post by Guest »

TRW looks to be doing pretty good. Not getting annihilated like everyone thought. Dark horse.
Guest

Re: 2015 AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Wed Oct 02, 2024 10:57 am It's probably the opposite. Committed parent group heavily committed to getting better and keeping a good group of kids together. They are all probably paying more as a result. Haters are going to hate, and if there's a parent who's willing and able to donate his time and money on top of all that... it's not a bad thing. Can't take it with you!
Funding is important to me since I work hard 9 to 5, so I've compiled a list of teams who have the lowest fees:

From lowest to highest:

1. JRC (free rides for at least 3 players, other players make up cost)
2. DMF (free rides for the top two players, other players make up cost)
3. TM (free rides for the top player, other players make up cost)
4. VK (free ride for at least one player and possibly one goalie, other players make up cost)
5. TYN (free rides for the top two players, other players make up cost)
6. TT (low cost for all players, less than $750 per family)
7. Reps (no free rides)
8. TRW (no free rides)
9. MS (no free rides, very high coaching cost)
10. NYR (no free rides, crazy high fees)
11. MM (no free rides, insanely high fees)
12. MR (no free rides, highest fees)
Guest

Re: 2015 AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Thu Oct 03, 2024 9:17 am
Guest wrote: Wed Oct 02, 2024 10:57 am It's probably the opposite. Committed parent group heavily committed to getting better and keeping a good group of kids together. They are all probably paying more as a result. Haters are going to hate, and if there's a parent who's willing and able to donate his time and money on top of all that... it's not a bad thing. Can't take it with you!
Funding is important to me since I work hard 9 to 5, so I've compiled a list of teams who have the lowest fees:

From lowest to highest:

1. JRC (free rides for at least 3 players, other players make up cost)
2. DMF (free rides for the top two players, other players make up cost)
3. TM (free rides for the top player, other players make up cost)
4. VK (free ride for at least one player and possibly one goalie, other players make up cost)
5. TYN (free rides for the top two players, other players make up cost)
6. TT (low cost for all players, less than $750 per family)
7. Reps (no free rides)
8. TRW (no free rides)
9. MS (no free rides, very high coaching cost)
10. NYR (no free rides, crazy high fees)
11. MM (no free rides, insanely high fees)
12. MR (no free rides, highest fees)
That’s more or less correct. What is crazy, insanely and highest fees in Canadian dollar terms?
Guest

Re: 2015 AAA

Post by Guest »

I TRW at least their manager’s kid rides for free
Guest

Re: 2015 AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Thu Oct 03, 2024 9:17 am
Guest wrote: Wed Oct 02, 2024 10:57 am It's probably the opposite. Committed parent group heavily committed to getting better and keeping a good group of kids together. They are all probably paying more as a result. Haters are going to hate, and if there's a parent who's willing and able to donate his time and money on top of all that... it's not a bad thing. Can't take it with you!
Funding is important to me since I work hard 9 to 5, so I've compiled a list of teams who have the lowest fees:

From lowest to highest:

1. JRC (free rides for at least 3 players, other players make up cost)
2. DMF (free rides for the top two players, other players make up cost)
3. TM (free rides for the top player, other players make up cost)
4. VK (free ride for at least one player and possibly one goalie, other players make up cost)
5. TYN (free rides for the top two players, other players make up cost)
6. TT (low cost for all players, less than $750 per family)
7. Reps (no free rides)
8. TRW (no free rides)
9. MS (no free rides, very high coaching cost)
10. NYR (no free rides, crazy high fees)
11. MM (no free rides, insanely high fees)
12. MR (no free rides, highest fees)
No kid should get a free ride! Lol. This isnt Pro Sports. So if your a top kid you are probably getting more ice time already. The other parents have to watch there kid sit on the bench, who they paid a ton of money for him or her to develop. That's bullish at the u10 level. If kids are getting free rides, it should be discussed with the team.
Guest

Re: 2015 AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Thu Oct 03, 2024 10:18 am
Guest wrote: Thu Oct 03, 2024 9:17 am
Guest wrote: Wed Oct 02, 2024 10:57 am It's probably the opposite. Committed parent group heavily committed to getting better and keeping a good group of kids together. They are all probably paying more as a result. Haters are going to hate, and if there's a parent who's willing and able to donate his time and money on top of all that... it's not a bad thing. Can't take it with you!
Funding is important to me since I work hard 9 to 5, so I've compiled a list of teams who have the lowest fees:

From lowest to highest:

1. JRC (free rides for at least 3 players, other players make up cost)
2. DMF (free rides for the top two players, other players make up cost)
3. TM (free rides for the top player, other players make up cost)
4. VK (free ride for at least one player and possibly one goalie, other players make up cost)
5. TYN (free rides for the top two players, other players make up cost)
6. TT (low cost for all players, less than $750 per family)
7. Reps (no free rides)
8. TRW (no free rides)
9. MS (no free rides, very high coaching cost)
10. NYR (no free rides, crazy high fees)
11. MM (no free rides, insanely high fees)
12. MR (no free rides, highest fees)
No kid should get a free ride! Lol. This isnt Pro Sports. So if your a top kid you are probably getting more ice time already. The other parents have to watch there kid sit on the bench, who they paid a ton of money for him or her to develop. That's bullish at the u10 level. If kids are getting free rides, it should be discussed with the team.
Bud, this is AAA hockey, go back to HL if you want fair and equitable.
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “2004 And Younger”