Minor Hockey Talks - Hockey Forum

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 11:02 am

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 10:50 am

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 10:28 am

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 8:58 am

Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 1:51 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 08, 2025 8:35 pm

Come on, guys, MM is clearly stuck in your heads. It's time to stop being so obsessed with him. If he's really that bad, why have so many kids progressed to AAA teams under his guidance? And if he's so terrible, why is he set to coach in the OHF?

The AMHA bows like idiots to his OHL ref status. Duh. I have one of his former players who now plays elite aaa on a top 4 team in the G. He always liked to remind me that my kid is not a AAA player and made my hockey loving kid want to quit. He also blocked YSE from using him as an AP. How is that for development and positivity around the sport?

I know who this is, and your kid is an excellent hockey player. The only reason MM said he wasn't good enough for AAA is so that he can keep him for himself. He sure as hell keeps calling him for his stupid Bhoys in Green tho right. What a joke that man is. He did the same thing to the others that left. MM only does things that benefit MM.. plain and simple. He's a selfish, small small man, who gets off on controlling kids and ruining their self confidence. Side note, please bring your kid back to more local hockey... i miss watching him play.

You’d expect a coach to take pride in developing talented players and hope they reach their full potential. However, that’s not the case with MM. He undermines the kids, making them believe they’re only as good as his own child.

guys, move on. we get it. he's going to get the team again next year, just move your kid to king city - That seems to be the destination for most.

I prefer Richmond Hill because they have non-parent coaches for their AA teams.

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 12:53 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 11:02 am

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 10:50 am

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 10:28 am

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 8:58 am

Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 1:51 pm

The AMHA bows like idiots to his OHL ref status. Duh. I have one of his former players who now plays elite aaa on a top 4 team in the G. He always liked to remind me that my kid is not a AAA player and made my hockey loving kid want to quit. He also blocked YSE from using him as an AP. How is that for development and positivity around the sport?

I know who this is, and your kid is an excellent hockey player. The only reason MM said he wasn't good enough for AAA is so that he can keep him for himself. He sure as hell keeps calling him for his stupid Bhoys in Green tho right. What a joke that man is. He did the same thing to the others that left. MM only does things that benefit MM.. plain and simple. He's a selfish, small small man, who gets off on controlling kids and ruining their self confidence. Side note, please bring your kid back to more local hockey... i miss watching him play.

You’d expect a coach to take pride in developing talented players and hope they reach their full potential. However, that’s not the case with MM. He undermines the kids, making them believe they’re only as good as his own child.

guys, move on. we get it. he's going to get the team again next year, just move your kid to king city - That seems to be the destination for most.

I prefer Richmond Hill because they have non-parent coaches for their AA teams.

That's a huge selling point

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 1:31 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 12:53 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 11:02 am

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 10:50 am

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 10:28 am

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 8:58 am

I know who this is, and your kid is an excellent hockey player. The only reason MM said he wasn't good enough for AAA is so that he can keep him for himself. He sure as hell keeps calling him for his stupid Bhoys in Green tho right. What a joke that man is. He did the same thing to the others that left. MM only does things that benefit MM.. plain and simple. He's a selfish, small small man, who gets off on controlling kids and ruining their self confidence. Side note, please bring your kid back to more local hockey... i miss watching him play.

You’d expect a coach to take pride in developing talented players and hope they reach their full potential. However, that’s not the case with MM. He undermines the kids, making them believe they’re only as good as his own child.

guys, move on. we get it. he's going to get the team again next year, just move your kid to king city - That seems to be the destination for most.

I prefer Richmond Hill because they have non-parent coaches for their AA teams.

That's a huge selling point

Is it?

How much extra cost is it directly passed to each kid to have the non-parent coach?
Also, does that non-parent coach have a paid skill sessions business or something similar? Because if they do, wait until the kids that pay for that get special treatment, instead of just the one coaches son.

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 1:47 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 1:31 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 12:53 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 11:02 am

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 10:50 am

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 10:28 am
You’d expect a coach to take pride in developing talented players and hope they reach their full potential. However, that’s not the case with MM. He undermines the kids, making them believe they’re only as good as his own child.

guys, move on. we get it. he's going to get the team again next year, just move your kid to king city - That seems to be the destination for most.

I prefer Richmond Hill because they have non-parent coaches for their AA teams.

That's a huge selling point

Is it?

How much extra cost is it directly passed to each kid to have the non-parent coach?
Also, does that non-parent coach have a paid skill sessions business or something similar? Because if they do, wait until the kids that pay for that get special treatment, instead of just the one coaches son.

Ladies and gentlemen.. I give you MM himself

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 1:49 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 1:47 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 1:31 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 12:53 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 11:02 am

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 10:50 am

guys, move on. we get it. he's going to get the team again next year, just move your kid to king city - That seems to be the destination for most.

I prefer Richmond Hill because they have non-parent coaches for their AA teams.

That's a huge selling point

Is it?

How much extra cost is it directly passed to each kid to have the non-parent coach?
Also, does that non-parent coach have a paid skill sessions business or something similar? Because if they do, wait until the kids that pay for that get special treatment, instead of just the one coaches son.

Ladies and gentlemen.. I give you MM himself

Nah, I am a parent coach, who is done after this year of hockey. But, not this mythical MM guy that i've been following for pages and pages. I've never wanted to meet someone so badly in my life.

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 1:31 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 12:53 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 11:02 am

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 10:50 am

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 10:28 am

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 8:58 am

I know who this is, and your kid is an excellent hockey player. The only reason MM said he wasn't good enough for AAA is so that he can keep him for himself. He sure as hell keeps calling him for his stupid Bhoys in Green tho right. What a joke that man is. He did the same thing to the others that left. MM only does things that benefit MM.. plain and simple. He's a selfish, small small man, who gets off on controlling kids and ruining their self confidence. Side note, please bring your kid back to more local hockey... i miss watching him play.

You’d expect a coach to take pride in developing talented players and hope they reach their full potential. However, that’s not the case with MM. He undermines the kids, making them believe they’re only as good as his own child.

guys, move on. we get it. he's going to get the team again next year, just move your kid to king city - That seems to be the destination for most.

I prefer Richmond Hill because they have non-parent coaches for their AA teams.

That's a huge selling point

Is it?

How much extra cost is it directly passed to each kid to have the non-parent coach?
Also, does that non-parent coach have a paid skill sessions business or something similar? Because if they do, wait until the kids that pay for that get special treatment, instead of just the one coaches son.

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 4:44 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 1:31 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 12:53 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 11:02 am

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 10:50 am

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 10:28 am
You’d expect a coach to take pride in developing talented players and hope they reach their full potential. However, that’s not the case with MM. He undermines the kids, making them believe they’re only as good as his own child.

guys, move on. we get it. he's going to get the team again next year, just move your kid to king city - That seems to be the destination for most.

I prefer Richmond Hill because they have non-parent coaches for their AA teams.

That's a huge selling point

Is it?

How much extra cost is it directly passed to each kid to have the non-parent coach?
Also, does that non-parent coach have a paid skill sessions business or something similar? Because if they do, wait until the kids that pay for that get special treatment, instead of just the one coaches son.

It costs about $1000 per player for a paid coach. Lots of good ones, lots of bad ones. Unfortunately Aurora won’t attract any decent ones because the market just got more competitive and they won’t want to sully their name by the antics of CS as his crew of misfit morons.

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 6:29 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 4:44 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 1:31 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 12:53 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 11:02 am

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 10:50 am

guys, move on. we get it. he's going to get the team again next year, just move your kid to king city - That seems to be the destination for most.

I prefer Richmond Hill because they have non-parent coaches for their AA teams.

That's a huge selling point

Is it?

How much extra cost is it directly passed to each kid to have the non-parent coach?
Also, does that non-parent coach have a paid skill sessions business or something similar? Because if they do, wait until the kids that pay for that get special treatment, instead of just the one coaches son.

It costs about $1000 per player for a paid coach. Lots of good ones, lots of bad ones. Unfortunately Aurora won’t attract any decent ones because the market just got more competitive and they won’t want to sully their name by the antics of CS as his crew of misfit morons.

You make some solid points. I think there are both good and bad coaches in both categories (parent / non parent) the bigger problem is the AMHA doesn’t use them. I’m sure Aurora has some good coaches, just the ones we’ve had to deal with have been terrible.

Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 10:35 pm All these No names haters make me sick. He never intended to coach AA but stepped up as a favour because he knows his child would actually prefer playing in a lower tier. He’s making significant sacrifices for this.