Minor Hockey Talks - Hockey Forum

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 2:22 pm Watch out crc and Whitby loading up crc going to be top 3 in Omha and top 20 in Ontario book it .

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 3:02 pm 1. DMF
2. TT
3. VK
4. JRC
5. TM
6. TRW
7. NYR
8. REPS
9. SENS
10. REBS
11. MM
12. TBK
13. NATS

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 2:39 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 2:22 pm Watch out crc and Whitby loading up crc going to be top 3 in Omha and top 20 in Ontario book it .

Shhhhhhhh.................go away. does your son know your posting such garbage. crc gets all the gthl kids who cant make any G team.

you picked up a bunch this year.

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 2:22 pm Watch out crc and Whitby loading up crc going to be top 3 in Omha and top 20 in Ontario book it .

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 1:25 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 1:02 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 11:00 am

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 10:30 am

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 9:44 am Anyone else hear about how the TN, joke of a team got a michigan hit on them by a AA team that had never skated together before? Thats crazy. I dont know who in their right mind let that team be formed. How are AAA teams like that not able to pull together AAA players from other teams, joke and embarrassment to the organization.

You want to know how this team was formed? Nats could have had several existing AAA players but that didn’t fit the agenda. The plan is to fill the roster with mostly AA kids, with desperate clueless naive parents who will pay any amount to have their kids play AAA. That way when the team is shit and losing every night, the parent group can’t complain because theyre just happy to be there and grateful someone gave their kid the extra A.
Coach gets to rake in $$$, have a compliant and quiet parent group and zero pressure to develop or perform. It’s a minor hockey masterpiece.
Nats parents, your kid won’t get drafted from playing on the nats, won’t get looked at from scouts, colleges or other coaches for the following year. You won’t even benefit from better coaching or development. There are zero benefits. Sorry but you’ve been scammed.

Tell us you’re a TN cut without saying you’re a TN cut. Lol!

Not every poster who sheds light on a team is a “ cut”. This is the truth, you might not like it but it doesn’t change the fact that it’s still the truth. As with anything in life, follow the money it never lies.

Only a “cut” would give TN this much space in their head.

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 1:40 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 1:32 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 1:27 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 7:08 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 5:09 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 2:46 pm

OMG Dad. Really proving your point here! lol.... VP beats any of these team. So why did REPS tie the NATS, but the Nats lost to VP???? MM did not win a game. How about you say a AA team went 4-0 in a AAA tournament and my sons AAA team did not win a game!!!

I have no bias as I wasn't part of this tournament. You have to give VP credit for finishing 2nd overall and losing 1-0 in the first round in a AAA event. I'm just saying.........

All the teams mentioned are dog dung, who cares. No credit given. WW and TN are AA level players.

Let the VP dads have their moment in the sunshine they deserve it, they had a fantastic year and that team should be congratulated.
But it's the closest their kids will ever get to AAA hockey.

Give them their moment of fame.
When the time is up (and it is) we can all go back to not fiving a flying F#CK about AA hockey.

Does your wife know you spend your free time making fun of AA on MHT! Scrub.

Buddy. Go back to the AA forum. No cares about AA here.
You’re like a drunk who won’t leave the bar after being kicked out - just hanging out on the sidewalk talking shit.

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 1:32 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 1:27 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 7:08 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 5:09 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 2:46 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 1:44 pm

here you have it...
Bears 4 - Vaughn Knights (Vaughan Rangers) 1
Bears 2 Canucks 1 (NATS)
Bears 3 - AAO Hockey 1 (Whitby Wildcats)
Bears 3 - Prohoc Lewis 1 (Mostly AA players)
Bears 1 - AAO Hockey 2 (Whitby Wildcats)

Vaughan Panthers beat the NATS,
Vaughan Panthers went 1-1 with Whitby Wildcats,
and they beat 2 AA teams.
They didn't play the REPS, REBS or MM.

Nice showing by the Vaughan Panthers AA team, but the reality is that if they played REPS, REBS or MM, or any other team in the tournament aside from the 3 teams they played, which happen to be the 3 weakest teams in the tournament, they would have gone 0-4 like the Vaughan Rangers did. But good on them!

OMG Dad. Really proving your point here! lol.... VP beats any of these team. So why did REPS tie the NATS, but the Nats lost to VP???? MM did not win a game. How about you say a AA team went 4-0 in a AAA tournament and my sons AAA team did not win a game!!!

I have no bias as I wasn't part of this tournament. You have to give VP credit for finishing 2nd overall and losing 1-0 in the first round in a AAA event. I'm just saying.........

All the teams mentioned are dog dung, who cares. No credit given. WW and TN are AA level players.

Let the VP dads have their moment in the sunshine they deserve it, they had a fantastic year and that team should be congratulated.
But it's the closest their kids will ever get to AAA hockey.

Give them their moment of fame.
When the time is up (and it is) we can all go back to not fiving a flying F#CK about AA hockey.

Does your wife know you spend your free time making fun of AA on MHT! Scrub.