by Guest » Mon May 06, 2024 2:49 pm
1 SYB Deep team hard to play against
2 TR Added goals and solid goalie
3 MI Solid core, need to play less dirty
4 LF Cut some dead weight
5 NYK Wanting to win goes a long way, adding a few players helps
6 NT Can't handle losing and will explode. 1/2 way into season only their Nannies will watch game
7 FH Coach was happy team was to fold, now unhappy he has to coach a bad team.
8 SIR Don't like them this far back, but don't see them winning much. I hope they can swap with NT
9 EE Should have got a new coach and recruited heavy.
1-3 can realistically go any way as they are 3 steady programs. Any variation of the 3 teams would surprise anyone.
4-6 seem a bit High. #4 Leaside are what they are and will be competitive. NYK will need to really earn that #5 slot you put them in. I think NT at #6 is one off the mark. I see them slide in at #7.
7-8. I can see SIR being in #6. They always seem to find a way. FH coach...i heard the opposite and didn't want team to fold. If it came down to unmotivated team then they wont be very good. Not EE bad, but still bad.
9 is accurate. Since jumping up to AA from A after U10 they have shown nothing to justify the move. Should have been relegated down to A along with DMM. This isn't a knock. People can Not Allowed and moan about the coaching, the recruiting, etc. The fact is they simply weren't competitive enough at U11 and U12 and should have followed DMM down.
[quote]
1 SYB Deep team hard to play against
2 TR Added goals and solid goalie
3 MI Solid core, need to play less dirty
4 LF Cut some dead weight
5 NYK Wanting to win goes a long way, adding a few players helps
6 NT Can't handle losing and will explode. 1/2 way into season only their Nannies will watch game
7 FH Coach was happy team was to fold, now unhappy he has to coach a bad team.
8 SIR Don't like them this far back, but don't see them winning much. I hope they can swap with NT
9 EE Should have got a new coach and recruited heavy.
[/quote]
1-3 can realistically go any way as they are 3 steady programs. Any variation of the 3 teams would surprise anyone.
4-6 seem a bit High. #4 Leaside are what they are and will be competitive. NYK will need to really earn that #5 slot you put them in. I think NT at #6 is one off the mark. I see them slide in at #7.
7-8. I can see SIR being in #6. They always seem to find a way. FH coach...i heard the opposite and didn't want team to fold. If it came down to unmotivated team then they wont be very good. Not EE bad, but still bad.
9 is accurate. Since jumping up to AA from A after U10 they have shown nothing to justify the move. Should have been relegated down to A along with DMM. This isn't a knock. People can Not Allowed and moan about the coaching, the recruiting, etc. The fact is they simply weren't competitive enough at U11 and U12 and should have followed DMM down.