A new place to talk about minor hockey in North America & Around the World. Jump in to the Minor Hockey Talk forum and discuss everything about Hockey in Canada & Hockey in the USA
Skip to content
by Guest » Fri May 17, 2024 4:44 pm
by Guest » Fri May 17, 2024 4:11 pm
by Guest » Fri May 17, 2024 3:52 pm
by Guest » Fri May 17, 2024 3:30 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 3:19 pm Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:42 pm Markham has no KSL teams nor kids playing in KSL. This is why rating a Markham team so high doesn’t make sense. Again this team literally just played the 2015 Nats and were up 3-1 at one point in the game. So unless you're saying the Nats are garbage, sit this one out.
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:42 pm Markham has no KSL teams nor kids playing in KSL. This is why rating a Markham team so high doesn’t make sense.
by Guest » Fri May 17, 2024 3:27 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:52 pm Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:42 pm Markham has no KSL teams nor kids playing in KSL. This is why rating a Markham team so high doesn’t make sense. Especially in U10. Over the span of the year, you might see that the kids had unlaying talent all along, but, it will take them a while to catch up to the other kids. So you just need to hope that the kids catch up quickly before the other kids continue their development path starting further along. So are they going to be set up for success or what? Do they have top notch coaching? Are they going to be given access to top notch power skating and skill development? Are the kids going to be the type of kids to go "above and beyond" team training to do their own stuff? time will tell. Stouffville MD and Markham MD programs both looked average at best when I saw them. So its not like they were even the best of the best in MD either.
by Guest » Fri May 17, 2024 3:21 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 3:11 pm Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:38 pm Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:26 pm Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:07 pm Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 1:43 pm Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 10:19 am They've played tier 1 Canlan tournaments the last two years. Often among the top teams. This year a couple weeks ago they were up 3-1 on the Nats early, then lost the game. They're right there with the mid pack G teams. So usually that means upper pack OMHA. Lol fake news... Mid pack G teams are absolutely not = to upper pack OMHA. MAYBE at the older ages U10, U11, U12 they are about equal. Waxers are a mid-pack team for sure. Exactly. Mid pack G is equal to mid pack OMHA not upper OmHA teams. This year DMF was mid pack G at u10. They would absolutely be a top 3 OMHA team. Not a chance. Also, with KSLs best teams feeding into OMHA you will see those teams start to become better at the younger ages than the G teams. The DMF comment is correct … further context Nats 2014 just beat Quinte 7-1 Nats finished 3rd/4th in the season. Quinte was tops DMF would destroy WW or Barrie.
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:38 pm Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:26 pm Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:07 pm Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 1:43 pm Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 10:19 am They've played tier 1 Canlan tournaments the last two years. Often among the top teams. This year a couple weeks ago they were up 3-1 on the Nats early, then lost the game. They're right there with the mid pack G teams. So usually that means upper pack OMHA. Lol fake news... Mid pack G teams are absolutely not = to upper pack OMHA. MAYBE at the older ages U10, U11, U12 they are about equal. Waxers are a mid-pack team for sure. Exactly. Mid pack G is equal to mid pack OMHA not upper OmHA teams. This year DMF was mid pack G at u10. They would absolutely be a top 3 OMHA team. Not a chance. Also, with KSLs best teams feeding into OMHA you will see those teams start to become better at the younger ages than the G teams.
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:26 pm Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:07 pm Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 1:43 pm Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 10:19 am They've played tier 1 Canlan tournaments the last two years. Often among the top teams. This year a couple weeks ago they were up 3-1 on the Nats early, then lost the game. They're right there with the mid pack G teams. So usually that means upper pack OMHA. Lol fake news... Mid pack G teams are absolutely not = to upper pack OMHA. MAYBE at the older ages U10, U11, U12 they are about equal. Waxers are a mid-pack team for sure. Exactly. Mid pack G is equal to mid pack OMHA not upper OmHA teams. This year DMF was mid pack G at u10. They would absolutely be a top 3 OMHA team.
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:07 pm Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 1:43 pm Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 10:19 am They've played tier 1 Canlan tournaments the last two years. Often among the top teams. This year a couple weeks ago they were up 3-1 on the Nats early, then lost the game. They're right there with the mid pack G teams. So usually that means upper pack OMHA. Lol fake news... Mid pack G teams are absolutely not = to upper pack OMHA. MAYBE at the older ages U10, U11, U12 they are about equal. Waxers are a mid-pack team for sure. Exactly. Mid pack G is equal to mid pack OMHA not upper OmHA teams.
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 1:43 pm Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 10:19 am They've played tier 1 Canlan tournaments the last two years. Often among the top teams. This year a couple weeks ago they were up 3-1 on the Nats early, then lost the game. They're right there with the mid pack G teams. So usually that means upper pack OMHA. Lol fake news... Mid pack G teams are absolutely not = to upper pack OMHA. MAYBE at the older ages U10, U11, U12 they are about equal. Waxers are a mid-pack team for sure.
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 10:19 am They've played tier 1 Canlan tournaments the last two years. Often among the top teams. This year a couple weeks ago they were up 3-1 on the Nats early, then lost the game. They're right there with the mid pack G teams. So usually that means upper pack OMHA.
by Guest » Fri May 17, 2024 3:19 pm
by Guest » Fri May 17, 2024 3:15 pm
by Guest » Fri May 17, 2024 3:11 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:38 pm Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:26 pm Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:07 pm Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 1:43 pm Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 10:19 am Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 10:11 am Standing from previous tournaments? Are they playing at Elite, AAA or AA? They've played tier 1 Canlan tournaments the last two years. Often among the top teams. This year a couple weeks ago they were up 3-1 on the Nats early, then lost the game. They're right there with the mid pack G teams. So usually that means upper pack OMHA. Lol fake news... Mid pack G teams are absolutely not = to upper pack OMHA. MAYBE at the older ages U10, U11, U12 they are about equal. Waxers are a mid-pack team for sure. Exactly. Mid pack G is equal to mid pack OMHA not upper OmHA teams. This year DMF was mid pack G at u10. They would absolutely be a top 3 OMHA team. Not a chance. Also, with KSLs best teams feeding into OMHA you will see those teams start to become better at the younger ages than the G teams.
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:26 pm Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:07 pm Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 1:43 pm Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 10:19 am Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 10:11 am Standing from previous tournaments? Are they playing at Elite, AAA or AA? They've played tier 1 Canlan tournaments the last two years. Often among the top teams. This year a couple weeks ago they were up 3-1 on the Nats early, then lost the game. They're right there with the mid pack G teams. So usually that means upper pack OMHA. Lol fake news... Mid pack G teams are absolutely not = to upper pack OMHA. MAYBE at the older ages U10, U11, U12 they are about equal. Waxers are a mid-pack team for sure. Exactly. Mid pack G is equal to mid pack OMHA not upper OmHA teams. This year DMF was mid pack G at u10. They would absolutely be a top 3 OMHA team.
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:07 pm Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 1:43 pm Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 10:19 am Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 10:11 am Standing from previous tournaments? Are they playing at Elite, AAA or AA? They've played tier 1 Canlan tournaments the last two years. Often among the top teams. This year a couple weeks ago they were up 3-1 on the Nats early, then lost the game. They're right there with the mid pack G teams. So usually that means upper pack OMHA. Lol fake news... Mid pack G teams are absolutely not = to upper pack OMHA. MAYBE at the older ages U10, U11, U12 they are about equal. Waxers are a mid-pack team for sure. Exactly. Mid pack G is equal to mid pack OMHA not upper OmHA teams.
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 1:43 pm Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 10:19 am Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 10:11 am Standing from previous tournaments? Are they playing at Elite, AAA or AA? They've played tier 1 Canlan tournaments the last two years. Often among the top teams. This year a couple weeks ago they were up 3-1 on the Nats early, then lost the game. They're right there with the mid pack G teams. So usually that means upper pack OMHA. Lol fake news... Mid pack G teams are absolutely not = to upper pack OMHA. MAYBE at the older ages U10, U11, U12 they are about equal. Waxers are a mid-pack team for sure.
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 10:19 am Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 10:11 am Standing from previous tournaments? Are they playing at Elite, AAA or AA? They've played tier 1 Canlan tournaments the last two years. Often among the top teams. This year a couple weeks ago they were up 3-1 on the Nats early, then lost the game. They're right there with the mid pack G teams. So usually that means upper pack OMHA.
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 10:11 am Standing from previous tournaments? Are they playing at Elite, AAA or AA?
by Guest » Fri May 17, 2024 2:52 pm
Top