by Guest » Thu May 02, 2024 7:26 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Thu May 02, 2024 9:17 am
Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 3:42 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 3:40 pm
Don't confuse "paid non-parent" for a better experience or higher level coaching.
Totally agree. But it can. Be better for the overall health of the team (as long as they don’t own a hockey development program. Ha. )
A huge conflict of interest with HCs owning hockey schools and have kids in the program like RH
All the AAA non parents have hockey schools, even some of the AA non parents. It’s pay for play, commit to their off season “program” or you don’t make the team.
[quote=Guest post_id=120560 time=1714655840]
[quote=Guest post_id=119055 time=1714246947]
[quote=Guest post_id=119054 time=1714246854]
Don't confuse "paid non-parent" for a better experience or higher level coaching.
[/quote]
Totally agree. But it can. Be better for the overall health of the team (as long as they don’t own a hockey development program. Ha. )
[/quote]
A huge conflict of interest with HCs owning hockey schools and have kids in the program like RH
[/quote]
All the AAA non parents have hockey schools, even some of the AA non parents. It’s pay for play, commit to their off season “program” or you don’t make the team.