Re: Rebels: Who did they play? What were the scores? Was it full-contact?
[/quote]
Only thing I can find for a Detroit Tourney is this
https://www.instagram.com/p/C6JG9vzgWrD which is on 2011 little ceasars Instagram
[/quote]
Terriers no. 2 US
Ceasears no. 3 US
LA no. 5 US
Mission no. 8 US
Oakland no. 9 US
CBJ no. 11 US
Actually looks like good hockey.
[/quote]
Very good line up of teams.
Who were the semi games?
Who won it all?
[/quote]
Rebs dad here. Just a showcase, everyone played six.
LA Kings went 5-1, with a loss to Caesars and an OT win over Blue Jackets and win over Mission. Kings looked like best team to us.
Caesars went 5-1, with a loss to Mission and an OT win over Blue Jackets. We watched a lot of that one after our last one and it was a great game.
Mission went 3-2-1, with a win over Little Caesars and a loss to LA and Terriers. They're huge
Blue Jackets were 2-2-2, with a win over Terriers and OT losses to Caesars and Kings. Surprised how good they were.
Terriers were 3-3, wins over Mission and Oakland, losses to Caesars LA and Blue Jackets. Big kid on their team is superb.
Oakland did well too, beat Blue Jackets and nearly beat Mission. Didn't look "worse" and was great game w Rebels in OT.
Rebels lost 4 of 5 but competitive. Beat Oakland in OT, tight games with others. Only Jackets and Caesars won by more than 2 I think against them.
Other team was some all star east coast thrown together team that hit everyone. They were good too. Had some TYN kids and Mid Fairfield goalie.
All of them but the east coasters had their "new" teams so was strong hockey. Lots of good physical games. Rebels hung in there. Not gonna be VK or Jrc but good
[/quote]
Heard the Rebs scored 6 goals all tournament. Hard to win with no scoring.
Highest points on the team was GL who came from JRC
[/quote]
Nice analysis of the weekend. Decent job for a team with lots of new players and full contact - good luck Rebs! Any other G teams had full contact tournaments already? How’d that go?