Minor Hockey Talks - Hockey Forum

Guest wrote: ↑Sat May 18, 2024 11:34 pm [who is the difference maker on mt

Guest wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2024 6:08 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2024 5:29 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2024 5:15 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2024 5:06 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2024 4:02 pm 2024-2025 Regular Season Rankings:

VR (best in class, they can be awarded the trophy now)
Eagles (slightly improved, always solid, always significant turnover, upgraded goaltending but beatable)
Beast (dramatically improved, suspensions, attitude problems and parent blow ups likely in the cards which could drop them in the standings)
NS (Always solid, well coached, coaching makes a difference even with a declining talent pool)
GTC (Tough team, lost some talented players, below average coaching)
FT (Solid, no better/no worse than last year but will be hard to make a jump in standings based on the skill of bottom third of team)
HVS (Another rebuild but dark horse pick for most improved)
MT (Declining prospects but may have picked up a difference maker which will help)
MJ (Middle of the pack as always, AAA price with no bang for the financial buck)
TW (Best coach, parents and team in the league, just ask them they'll tell you)
MR (Notwithstanding the BS posted, great coach, development will be excellent but not many standouts, could move up if things click)
VP (Primarily A players)
MWL (Coach has impressed, primarily A players, good parent group)
ST (Best rink and uniforms (need to look good to play good) but picked up some players that should be playing select)

Terriers better than Toros

Agreed . NS has lost a lot way to high on this list . All these list don’t mean shit till November .

They don't but what else is anyone going to post? Better than talking about TW or MR.

The poster must be either a Wml or hvs parent. How would they know the Wml coach has impressed and parent group is good?
Anyway, all good. I'm not sure how Hvs can possibly jump as much as you've predicted. Dark horse for me would be FT finishes 3/4. Can't see any other big surprises. Agree with most of the rest though.

Guest wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2024 5:29 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2024 5:15 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2024 5:06 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2024 4:02 pm 2024-2025 Regular Season Rankings:

VR (best in class, they can be awarded the trophy now)
Eagles (slightly improved, always solid, always significant turnover, upgraded goaltending but beatable)
Beast (dramatically improved, suspensions, attitude problems and parent blow ups likely in the cards which could drop them in the standings)
NS (Always solid, well coached, coaching makes a difference even with a declining talent pool)
GTC (Tough team, lost some talented players, below average coaching)
FT (Solid, no better/no worse than last year but will be hard to make a jump in standings based on the skill of bottom third of team)
HVS (Another rebuild but dark horse pick for most improved)
MT (Declining prospects but may have picked up a difference maker which will help)
MJ (Middle of the pack as always, AAA price with no bang for the financial buck)
TW (Best coach, parents and team in the league, just ask them they'll tell you)
MR (Notwithstanding the BS posted, great coach, development will be excellent but not many standouts, could move up if things click)
VP (Primarily A players)
MWL (Coach has impressed, primarily A players, good parent group)
ST (Best rink and uniforms (need to look good to play good) but picked up some players that should be playing select)

Terriers better than Toros

Agreed . NS has lost a lot way to high on this list . All these list don’t mean shit till November .

Guest wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2024 5:15 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2024 5:06 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2024 4:02 pm 2024-2025 Regular Season Rankings:

VR (best in class, they can be awarded the trophy now)
Eagles (slightly improved, always solid, always significant turnover, upgraded goaltending but beatable)
Beast (dramatically improved, suspensions, attitude problems and parent blow ups likely in the cards which could drop them in the standings)
NS (Always solid, well coached, coaching makes a difference even with a declining talent pool)
GTC (Tough team, lost some talented players, below average coaching)
FT (Solid, no better/no worse than last year but will be hard to make a jump in standings based on the skill of bottom third of team)
HVS (Another rebuild but dark horse pick for most improved)
MT (Declining prospects but may have picked up a difference maker which will help)
MJ (Middle of the pack as always, AAA price with no bang for the financial buck)
TW (Best coach, parents and team in the league, just ask them they'll tell you)
MR (Notwithstanding the BS posted, great coach, development will be excellent but not many standouts, could move up if things click)
VP (Primarily A players)
MWL (Coach has impressed, primarily A players, good parent group)
ST (Best rink and uniforms (need to look good to play good) but picked up some players that should be playing select)

Terriers better than Toros

Guest wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2024 5:06 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2024 4:02 pm 2024-2025 Regular Season Rankings:

VR (best in class, they can be awarded the trophy now)
Eagles (slightly improved, always solid, always significant turnover, upgraded goaltending but beatable)
Beast (dramatically improved, suspensions, attitude problems and parent blow ups likely in the cards which could drop them in the standings)
NS (Always solid, well coached, coaching makes a difference even with a declining talent pool)
GTC (Tough team, lost some talented players, below average coaching)
FT (Solid, no better/no worse than last year but will be hard to make a jump in standings based on the skill of bottom third of team)
HVS (Another rebuild but dark horse pick for most improved)
MT (Declining prospects but may have picked up a difference maker which will help)
MJ (Middle of the pack as always, AAA price with no bang for the financial buck)
TW (Best coach, parents and team in the league, just ask them they'll tell you)
MR (Notwithstanding the BS posted, great coach, development will be excellent but not many standouts, could move up if things click)
VP (Primarily A players)
MWL (Coach has impressed, primarily A players, good parent group)
ST (Best rink and uniforms (need to look good to play good) but picked up some players that should be playing select)

Guest wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2024 4:02 pm 2024-2025 Regular Season Rankings:

VR (best in class, they can be awarded the trophy now)
Eagles (slightly improved, always solid, always significant turnover, upgraded goaltending but beatable)
Beast (dramatically improved, suspensions, attitude problems and parent blow ups likely in the cards which could drop them in the standings)
NS (Always solid, well coached, coaching makes a difference even with a declining talent pool)
GTC (Tough team, lost some talented players, below average coaching)
FT (Solid, no better/no worse than last year but will be hard to make a jump in standings based on the skill of bottom third of team)
HVS (Another rebuild but dark horse pick for most improved)
MT (Declining prospects but may have picked up a difference maker which will help)
MJ (Middle of the pack as always, AAA price with no bang for the financial buck)
TW (Best coach, parents and team in the league, just ask them they'll tell you)
MR (Notwithstanding the BS posted, great coach, development will be excellent but not many standouts, could move up if things click)
VP (Primarily A players)
MWL (Coach has impressed, primarily A players, good parent group)
ST (Best rink and uniforms (need to look good to play good) but picked up some players that should be playing select)

Guest wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2024 4:02 pm 2024-2025 Regular Season Rankings:

VR (best in class, they can be awarded the trophy now)
Eagles (slightly improved, always solid, always significant turnover, upgraded goaltending but beatable)
Beast (dramatically improved, suspensions, attitude problems and parent blow ups likely in the cards which could drop them in the standings)
NS (Always solid, well coached, coaching makes a difference even with a declining talent pool)
GTC (Tough team, lost some talented players, below average coaching)
FT (Solid, no better/no worse than last year but will be hard to make a jump in standings based on the skill of bottom third of team)
HVS (Another rebuild but dark horse pick for most improved)
MT (Declining prospects but may have picked up a difference maker which will help)
MJ (Middle of the pack as always, AAA price with no bang for the financial buck)
TW (Best coach, parents and team in the league, just ask them they'll tell you)
MR (Notwithstanding the BS posted, great coach, development will be excellent but not many standouts, could move up if things click)
VP (Primarily A players)
MWL (Coach has impressed, primarily A players, good parent group)
ST (Best rink and uniforms (need to look good to play good) but picked up some players that should be playing select)

Guest wrote: ↑Wed May 15, 2024 2:06 pm Can the Eagles overtake the Rangers