OHL Rethinking Language Violation Policy After Mennonite Comment Suspension Sparks Debate

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: OHL Rethinking Language Violation Policy After Mennonite Comment Suspension Sparks Debate

Re: OHL Rethinking Language Violation Policy After Mennonite Comment Suspension Sparks Debate

by Guest » Thu Nov 28, 2024 4:21 pm

I know the Mennonite’s in the London area couldn’t understand why someone would get a suspension for it. I also think when Sim got the penalty earlier in the year for calling the player a Not allowed and got 5 games while the player in question had actually threatened bodily harm (son of the OHL Director of Referees) got nothing - in the real world off the ice you could be arrested. The hockey world was a buzz wondering if the OHL had lost their minds. Check out YouTube “The OHL is a Joke”. I truly believe a review is required or we are going to have players not wanting to join the CHL. Use some common sense.

OHL Rethinking Language Violation Policy After Mennonite Comment Suspension Sparks Debate

by OHLNewsbot » Wed Nov 27, 2024 1:09 pm

Is a five-game suspension in the OHL too harsh for non-hate-based trash talk? The recent suspension of Landon Sim for calling an opponent Mennonite has sparked debate. While the OHL's intention to curb harmful language is commendable, is a blanket five-game suspension suitable for all infractions? Where do we draw the line between unacceptable slurs and on-ice chirping? Does the severity of the punishment discourage players from engaging in any form of verbal sparring, even playful banter? What are the potential long-term effects of such strict enforcement on player development and the overall atmosphere of the game? This incident has opened a Pandora's Box, raising questions about the evolving culture of hockey and the need for a more nuanced approach to language violations. I predict we will see a revised OHL policy soon, one that differentiates between hateful slurs and less serious trash talk. What do you think? Share your experiences and opinions on this complex issue.

Top