Minor Hockey Talks - Hockey Forum

The Sarnia Sting are clearly all-in on NCAA-committed players, and it’s sparking some serious debate. Is this a winning strategy for OHL teams in the long run? The Sting have brought in three BCHL players with NCAA commitments this season alone. Is this a trend we’ll see more of? What are the potential benefits and drawbacks for both the teams and the players?

While Manza, Beamish, and O’Brien seem to be fitting in nicely in Sarnia, it begs the question: does this create an uneven playing field? Are teams without the resources to attract these players at a disadvantage?

This also raises questions about player development. Is the OHL becoming a stepping stone to the NCAA, rather than a league in its own right? What impact will this have on the CHL’s long-term future?

Perhaps even more intriguing is how this affects the dynamics within the team. Does having players with NCAA commitments change the team’s culture or create a divide between those with different career paths?

Finally, let’s get bold. Will this strategy propel the Sting to a championship run, or will it ultimately backfire? Share your thoughts and predictions.