Scott Oakman GTHL

Guest

Re: Scott Oakman GTHL

Post by Guest »

In the heart of the rink, where dreams take flight,
Lurked a man named Scott, with power and might.
Commissioner of hockey, with a darkened soul,
He played dirty games, to reach his goal.

Underneath the ice, his schemes did thrive,
Corrupting the sport, to keep his drive alive.
He twisted rules, with a deceitful hand,
Leaving fairness and justice sinking in quicksand.

Players and coaches, they knew his game,
But dared not challenge, his tainted fame.
For Scott held the strings, of the hockey world's fate,
A puppeteer of chaos, sealing their fate.

But in the shadows, a whisper arose,
Of justice and truth, no longer in repose.
A rebellion brewed, against Scott's reign,
To cleanse the ice, from his foul stain.

With unity and courage, they took a stand,
To reclaim the honor, of their beloved land.
Farewell to Scott, the corrupt commissioner's blight,
For in the end, truth always wins the fight.
Guest

Re: Scott Oakman GTHL

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Mon Feb 19, 2024 12:09 pm In the heart of the rink, where dreams take flight,
Lurked a man named Scott, with power and might.
Commissioner of hockey, with a darkened soul,
He played dirty games, to reach his goal.

Underneath the ice, his schemes did thrive,
Corrupting the sport, to keep his drive alive.
He twisted rules, with a deceitful hand,
Leaving fairness and justice sinking in quicksand.

Players and coaches, they knew his game,
But dared not challenge, his tainted fame.
For Scott held the strings, of the hockey world's fate,
A puppeteer of chaos, sealing their fate.

But in the shadows, a whisper arose,
Of justice and truth, no longer in repose.
A rebellion brewed, against Scott's reign,
To cleanse the ice, from his foul stain.

With unity and courage, they took a stand,
To reclaim the honor, of their beloved land.
Farewell to Scott, the corrupt commissioner's blight,
For in the end, truth always wins the fight.
Sighned, Donald J. Trump ^^^
Commander and Chief.
Guest

Re: Scott Oakman GTHL

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Mon Feb 19, 2024 10:04 am One of Scott's mandate was to reduce costs in the G. He has done this with the elimination of gate fees, restricting team budgets and holding G fees. Hockey is cheaper than two years ago. It is going in the right direction.
Spoken like a true lackey. Our team financials surpassed 190k this year without anything extra. 2 yrs ago, we were 100k. So my math shows that while the G fee dropped temporarily by what 50.00?, our team fees almost doubled. For coaches who are on the take, families buying letters and other shady dealings.
So the only direction the G is headed, is further down the toilet.
A full and complete independent audit with a board and exec overhaul is needed. This is not non profit hockey and it's time HC and CRA stepped in.
Guest

Re: Scott Oakman GTHL

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Mon Feb 19, 2024 5:12 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Feb 19, 2024 10:04 am One of Scott's mandate was to reduce costs in the G. He has done this with the elimination of gate fees, restricting team budgets and holding G fees. Hockey is cheaper than two years ago. It is going in the right direction.
Spoken like a true lackey. Our team financials surpassed 190k this year without anything extra. 2 yrs ago, we were 100k. So my math shows that while the G fee dropped temporarily by what 50.00?, our team fees almost doubled. For coaches who are on the take, families buying letters and other shady dealings.
So the only direction the G is headed, is further down the toilet.
A full and complete independent audit with a board and exec overhaul is needed. This is not non profit hockey and it's time HC and CRA stepped in.
100%

Hockey in the GTA needs a complete overhaul. Out with the old, in with the new.
Guest

Re: Scott Oakman GTHL

Post by Guest »

Audit
Guest

Re: Scott Oakman GTHL

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Mon Feb 19, 2024 6:25 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Feb 19, 2024 5:12 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Feb 19, 2024 10:04 am One of Scott's mandate was to reduce costs in the G. He has done this with the elimination of gate fees, restricting team budgets and holding G fees. Hockey is cheaper than two years ago. It is going in the right direction.
Spoken like a true lackey. Our team financials surpassed 190k this year without anything extra. 2 yrs ago, we were 100k. So my math shows that while the G fee dropped temporarily by what 50.00?, our team fees almost doubled. For coaches who are on the take, families buying letters and other shady dealings.
So the only direction the G is headed, is further down the toilet.
A full and complete independent audit with a board and exec overhaul is needed. This is not non profit hockey and it's time HC and CRA stepped in.
100%

Hockey in the GTA needs a complete overhaul. Out with the old, in with the new.
Come on .. you are completely wrong with the G. A huge step under Oakman in getting costs down and corruption out of the league. Less private ownership and much more diverse boards across associations. This is leading to teams posting budgets on public websites .. yes, complete transparency. If you have a paid coach, fee right there on a public website. If you host a tournament, all revenues and expenses clearly identified. Yes, Hockey Canada drives some of the decisions .. however, the G is making sure their leagues are balanced, diverse and consistent experience across 'like' ability players and age groups. People on here don't have a balanced perspective.
Guest

Re: Scott Oakman GTHL

Post by Guest »

Oakman is Satan
Guest

Re: Scott Oakman GTHL

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Mon Feb 19, 2024 7:27 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Feb 19, 2024 6:25 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Feb 19, 2024 5:12 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Feb 19, 2024 10:04 am One of Scott's mandate was to reduce costs in the G. He has done this with the elimination of gate fees, restricting team budgets and holding G fees. Hockey is cheaper than two years ago. It is going in the right direction.
Spoken like a true lackey. Our team financials surpassed 190k this year without anything extra. 2 yrs ago, we were 100k. So my math shows that while the G fee dropped temporarily by what 50.00?, our team fees almost doubled. For coaches who are on the take, families buying letters and other shady dealings.
So the only direction the G is headed, is further down the toilet.
A full and complete independent audit with a board and exec overhaul is needed. This is not non profit hockey and it's time HC and CRA stepped in.
100%

Hockey in the GTA needs a complete overhaul. Out with the old, in with the new.
Come on .. you are completely wrong with the G. A huge step under Oakman in getting costs down and corruption out of the league. Less private ownership and much more diverse boards across associations. This is leading to teams posting budgets on public websites .. yes, complete transparency. If you have a paid coach, fee right there on a public website. If you host a tournament, all revenues and expenses clearly identified. Yes, Hockey Canada drives some of the decisions .. however, the G is making sure their leagues are balanced, diverse and consistent experience across 'like' ability players and age groups. People on here don't have a balanced perspective.
He's been there for too long. They need to set a 4 year maximum term for his job. As well as an outside independent board member.
Guest

Re: Scott Oakman GTHL

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Mon Feb 19, 2024 6:25 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Feb 19, 2024 5:12 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Feb 19, 2024 10:04 am One of Scott's mandate was to reduce costs in the G. He has done this with the elimination of gate fees, restricting team budgets and holding G fees. Hockey is cheaper than two years ago. It is going in the right direction.
Spoken like a true lackey. Our team financials surpassed 190k this year without anything extra. 2 yrs ago, we were 100k. So my math shows that while the G fee dropped temporarily by what 50.00?, our team fees almost doubled. For coaches who are on the take, families buying letters and other shady dealings.
So the only direction the G is headed, is further down the toilet.
A full and complete independent audit with a board and exec overhaul is needed. This is not non profit hockey and it's time HC and CRA stepped in.
100%

Hockey in the GTA needs a complete overhaul. Out with the old, in with the new.
Start with Hockey Canada and work your way down provincially, replace them all.
Guest

Re: Scott Oakman GTHL

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Mon Feb 19, 2024 9:28 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Feb 19, 2024 7:27 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Feb 19, 2024 6:25 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Feb 19, 2024 5:12 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Feb 19, 2024 10:04 am One of Scott's mandate was to reduce costs in the G. He has done this with the elimination of gate fees, restricting team budgets and holding G fees. Hockey is cheaper than two years ago. It is going in the right direction.
Spoken like a true lackey. Our team financials surpassed 190k this year without anything extra. 2 yrs ago, we were 100k. So my math shows that while the G fee dropped temporarily by what 50.00?, our team fees almost doubled. For coaches who are on the take, families buying letters and other shady dealings.
So the only direction the G is headed, is further down the toilet.
A full and complete independent audit with a board and exec overhaul is needed. This is not non profit hockey and it's time HC and CRA stepped in.
100%

Hockey in the GTA needs a complete overhaul. Out with the old, in with the new.
Come on .. you are completely wrong with the G. A huge step under Oakman in getting costs down and corruption out of the league. Less private ownership and much more diverse boards across associations. This is leading to teams posting budgets on public websites .. yes, complete transparency. If you have a paid coach, fee right there on a public website. If you host a tournament, all revenues and expenses clearly identified. Yes, Hockey Canada drives some of the decisions .. however, the G is making sure their leagues are balanced, diverse and consistent experience across 'like' ability players and age groups. People on here don't have a balanced perspective.
He's been there for too long. They need to set a 4 year maximum term for his job. As well as an outside independent board member.
Good point around change and term for a job like this one. However, don't underestimate the work the Oakman has done in making the G more competitive and teams more balanced, driving diversity to all Association Boards that represent G teams, removing unnecessary costs and corruption that existed prior to his term and most importantly stabilizing participation rates in this great game. Thank you, Oakman!
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “2004 And Younger”