Scta 2010

Guest

Re: Scta 2010

Post by Guest »

CRC definately loosing players next year, 9 gone to the G Rebs I am told, Also loosing one to YSE but not sure who.
Guest

Re: Scta 2010

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Sun Mar 16, 2025 9:19 pm CRC definately loosing players next year, 9 gone to the G Rebs I am told, Also loosing one to YSE but not sure who.
1st place west to out of playoffs with Rebs ?
Guest

Re: Scta 2010

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Sun Mar 16, 2025 9:19 pm CRC definately loosing players next year, 9 gone to the G Rebs I am told, Also loosing one to YSE but not sure who.

There's 30 players in line to take those spots. Unfortunately it's not your kid.
Guest

Re: Scta 2010

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Sun Mar 16, 2025 10:19 pm
Guest wrote: Sun Mar 16, 2025 9:19 pm CRC definately loosing players next year, 9 gone to the G Rebs I am told, Also loosing one to YSE but not sure who.

There's 30 players in line to take those spots. Unfortunately it's not your kid.
hahaha there are always 30 kids in line, unfortunately for them they are always lower level trying to make the jump. #9 easily makes that team and most GTHL teams. The rebels, like most teams need an edge to put them over the rest next season. This is something CRC doesn't understand and why, if they dont do something this season, next season will be a struggle. Its already evident with how their season ended, worse record than last season. Coach has no idea
Keeping both goalies, Cutting 2 forwards, losing 2 more due to movement and 1 cut D and 2 moving
Guest

Re: Scta 2010

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Tue Mar 11, 2025 12:37 am
Guest wrote: Thu Mar 06, 2025 6:59 pm Cr 91 can play.


so can CRC7, 9, 8, 11 and 17

How about CR 4, 22, 33, 65, 72, 77, 84 and 93.


CRC 91 is ready to play at the next level, as potentially are 3 to 5 other players on CRC. We haven't seen what a different coach can do with any of their top players, but if rumours are true we will see some changes next year and what happens, happens. Meanwhile the entire CRC team are players in the OMHA West. Let's see who goes on from the West to get beat by the East at the OMHA Finals.


There are 2 players on CRC that CAN play at the next level, thats it, and one of them is not 8.

Would love to know which 2? CRC dad
I don’t rank them as top players in comparison to the G kids.
Don’t get me wrong, they are good players but not on the same level as some of the top players in the G. That’s why they are non impactful in certain games/situations.
Impact players, where were they during Guelph game? Lets be real, if the goalies weren't having a bad game vs guelph and halton, they dont score as many goals. They will struggle vs better teams
Guest

Re: Scta 2010

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Mon Mar 17, 2025 8:36 am
Guest wrote: Tue Mar 11, 2025 12:37 am
Guest wrote: Thu Mar 06, 2025 6:59 pm Cr 91 can play.


so can CRC7, 9, 8, 11 and 17

How about CR 4, 22, 33, 65, 72, 77, 84 and 93.


CRC 91 is ready to play at the next level, as potentially are 3 to 5 other players on CRC. We haven't seen what a different coach can do with any of their top players, but if rumours are true we will see some changes next year and what happens, happens. Meanwhile the entire CRC team are players in the OMHA West. Let's see who goes on from the West to get beat by the East at the OMHA Finals.


There are 2 players on CRC that CAN play at the next level, thats it, and one of them is not 8.

Would love to know which 2? CRC dad
I don’t rank them as top players in comparison to the G kids.
Don’t get me wrong, they are good players but not on the same level as some of the top players in the G. That’s why they are non impactful in certain games/situations.
Impact players, where were they during Guelph game? Lets be real, if the goalies weren't having a bad game vs guelph and halton, they dont score as many goals. They will struggle vs better teams
What coaches dont understand is that the impact players in most key games come from unexpected sources. Need to trust the team
Guest

Re: Scta 2010

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Tue Mar 11, 2025 12:29 am
Guest wrote: Wed Mar 05, 2025 3:06 pm Cr 91 can play.
so can CRC7, 9, 8, 11 and 17
How about CR 4, 22, 33, 65, 72, 77, 84 and 93.
[/quote]

CRC 91 is ready to play at the next level, as potentially are 3 to 5 other players on CRC. We haven't seen what a different coach can do with any of their top players, but if rumours are true we will see some changes next year and what happens, happens. Meanwhile the entire CRC team are players in the OMHA West. Let's see who goes on from the West to get beat by the East at the OMHA Finals.
[/quote]

Lol have you seen CRC91 play outside of his team like spring tournaments or camp scrimmages. Total Bust. Kid doesn’t know how to play the pace of next level. Doesn’t forecheck nor back check. He’s only good with CRC as most of the legwork is done by his teammates.
[/quote]

True statement, decent scrimmage player that has a hard time dealing with other talented players and hides.
Guest

Re: Scta 2010

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Mon Mar 17, 2025 8:36 am
Guest wrote: Tue Mar 11, 2025 12:37 am
Guest wrote: Thu Mar 06, 2025 6:59 pm Cr 91 can play.


so can CRC7, 9, 8, 11 and 17

How about CR 4, 22, 33, 65, 72, 77, 84 and 93.


CRC 91 is ready to play at the next level, as potentially are 3 to 5 other players on CRC. We haven't seen what a different coach can do with any of their top players, but if rumours are true we will see some changes next year and what happens, happens. Meanwhile the entire CRC team are players in the OMHA West. Let's see who goes on from the West to get beat by the East at the OMHA Finals.


There are 2 players on CRC that CAN play at the next level, thats it, and one of them is not 8.

Would love to know which 2? CRC dad
I don’t rank them as top players in comparison to the G kids.
Don’t get me wrong, they are good players but not on the same level as some of the top players in the G. That’s why they are non impactful in certain games/situations.
Impact players, where were they during Guelph game? Lets be real, if the goalies weren't having a bad game vs guelph and halton, they dont score as many goals. They will struggle vs better teams
91 and 8 are good but selfish. Too worried about their personal glory to be effective but can get away with it in a weak division. 9 has hustle but no hockey IQ or finishing. Neither goalie belongs in AAA and the rest of the team is just meh. Add in archaic coaching and you can see why the other teams are catching up.
Guest

Re: Scta 2010

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Sun Mar 16, 2025 9:19 pm CRC definately loosing players next year, 9 gone to the G Rebs I am told, Also loosing one to YSE but not sure who.
Could only be 1of 2 players, both forwards
Guest

Re: Scta 2010

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Mon Mar 17, 2025 9:40 am
Guest wrote: Sun Mar 16, 2025 9:19 pm CRC definately loosing players next year, 9 gone to the G Rebs I am told, Also loosing one to YSE but not sure who.
Could only be 1of 2 players, both forwards
Easy to see, its CRC8
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post