2011 AAA

Guest

Re: 2011 AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 11:07 am
Guest wrote: Sun Sep 17, 2023 8:03 am
Guest wrote: Sun Sep 17, 2023 7:56 am Opening rankings prediction

1. QRD
2. VK
3. JRC
4. TM
5. EMC
I wouldn't be putting VK or JRC ahead of TM bud...try again
Tm
Emc
Qrd/jrc
Vk
This must be an OR parent. News flash!!! VK and JRC will crush you as well. Probably by more than TM did.
Guest

Re: 2011 AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 10:26 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 10:19 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 9:33 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 9:29 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 8:17 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 7:51 am

Ok, what was the score?
700
Will stick with 8-2 win for TM
6-1 TM
wow, huge improve. Bravo!
Did TM improve or did OR regress?
TM slight improvement. OR regress in relation to other teams. Most top team kids iq have improved so they can play well against a system like OR's. OR kids are stagnant scine their creativity is low after years of coaching to play robotically.
Guest

Re: 2011 AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 11:52 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 10:26 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 10:19 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 9:33 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 9:29 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 8:17 am

700
Will stick with 8-2 win for TM
6-1 TM
wow, huge improve. Bravo!
Did TM improve or did OR regress?
TM slight improvement. OR regress in relation to other teams. Most top team kids iq have improved so they can play well against a system like OR's. OR kids are stagnant scine their creativity is low after years of coaching to play robotically.
Watched OR alot this weekend. This is exactly what’s wrong with hockey in Canada. A coach who plays systems, shortens the bench (in exhibition games, lmao) just to win. Based on results this weekend, it’s not working. Zero creativity or individual development. Shame on you PO.
Guest

Re: 2011 AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 12:11 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 11:52 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 10:26 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 10:19 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 9:33 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 9:29 am

Will stick with 8-2 win for TM
6-1 TM
wow, huge improve. Bravo!
Did TM improve or did OR regress?
TM slight improvement. OR regress in relation to other teams. Most top team kids iq have improved so they can play well against a system like OR's. OR kids are stagnant scine their creativity is low after years of coaching to play robotically.
Watched OR alot this weekend. This is exactly what’s wrong with hockey in Canada. A coach who plays systems, shortens the bench (in exhibition games, lmao) just to win. Based on results this weekend, it’s not working. Zero creativity or individual development. Shame on you PO.
What type of system do they play? Does OR play similar to the Nats?
Guest

Re: 2011 AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 12:26 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 12:11 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 11:52 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 10:26 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 10:19 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 9:33 am

6-1 TM
wow, huge improve. Bravo!
Did TM improve or did OR regress?
TM slight improvement. OR regress in relation to other teams. Most top team kids iq have improved so they can play well against a system like OR's. OR kids are stagnant scine their creativity is low after years of coaching to play robotically.
Watched OR alot this weekend. This is exactly what’s wrong with hockey in Canada. A coach who plays systems, shortens the bench (in exhibition games, lmao) just to win. Based on results this weekend, it’s not working. Zero creativity or individual development. Shame on you PO.
What type of system do they play? Does OR play similar to the Nats?

Some OR parents were smirking and saying that they've got 3 or 4 top players from the G ready to jump ship and join OR next year. If that was even true I hope those G parents watched the TM game and saw how much further ahead the development is in the G among top teams. It was a total destruction of OR. When out became obvious early that TM was all over the OR system and shutting it down OR coaches and kids had no response, they just kept feeding into TM hands over and over and over. Total robots who could not adjust.
Guest

Re: 2011 AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 12:26 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 12:11 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 11:52 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 10:26 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 10:19 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 9:33 am

6-1 TM
wow, huge improve. Bravo!
Did TM improve or did OR regress?
TM slight improvement. OR regress in relation to other teams. Most top team kids iq have improved so they can play well against a system like OR's. OR kids are stagnant scine their creativity is low after years of coaching to play robotically.
Watched OR alot this weekend. This is exactly what’s wrong with hockey in Canada. A coach who plays systems, shortens the bench (in exhibition games, lmao) just to win. Based on results this weekend, it’s not working. Zero creativity or individual development. Shame on you PO.
What type of system do they play? Does OR play similar to the Nats?
Yes that would be a correct assumption. Only time will tell this year how the Nats and OR do.
Even my son says the same thing when on the ice against both teams.
They have zero creativity and will not progress well.
Guest

Re: 2011 AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 12:11 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 11:52 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 10:26 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 10:19 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 9:33 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 9:29 am

Will stick with 8-2 win for TM
6-1 TM
wow, huge improve. Bravo!
Did TM improve or did OR regress?
TM slight improvement. OR regress in relation to other teams. Most top team kids iq have improved so they can play well against a system like OR's. OR kids are stagnant scine their creativity is low after years of coaching to play robotically.
Watched OR alot this weekend. This is exactly what’s wrong with hockey in Canada. A coach who plays systems, shortens the bench (in exhibition games, lmao) just to win. Based on results this weekend, it’s not working. Zero creativity or individual development. Shame on you PO.
Shortening the bench in exhibition games destroys the benched kids confidence and limits their opportunity to improve. Some coaches care, others are about W's only, not the commitment to developing all players. Suppose you don't have to worry about the benched kids since they will be replaced next year anyway with kids that were developed elsewhere.
Guest

Re: 2011 AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 12:56 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 12:26 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 12:11 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 11:52 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 10:26 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 10:19 am
wow, huge improve. Bravo!
Did TM improve or did OR regress?
TM slight improvement. OR regress in relation to other teams. Most top team kids iq have improved so they can play well against a system like OR's. OR kids are stagnant scine their creativity is low after years of coaching to play robotically.
Watched OR alot this weekend. This is exactly what’s wrong with hockey in Canada. A coach who plays systems, shortens the bench (in exhibition games, lmao) just to win. Based on results this weekend, it’s not working. Zero creativity or individual development. Shame on you PO.
What type of system do they play? Does OR play similar to the Nats?
Yes that would be a correct assumption. Only time will tell this year how the Nats and OR do.
Even my son says the same thing when on the ice against both teams.
They have zero creativity and will not progress well.
Game was definitely different form this time last year. The system looked smart when kids were younger but when the system is challenged, we have a system malfunction!! No surprise to anyone on here. that's the strength of the G. Its curious to watch the OR bench implode from the undue coach-induced pressure. Chokeville earns its moniker.
Guest

Re: 2011 AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 12:40 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 12:26 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 12:11 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 11:52 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 10:26 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 10:19 am
wow, huge improve. Bravo!
Did TM improve or did OR regress?
TM slight improvement. OR regress in relation to other teams. Most top team kids iq have improved so they can play well against a system like OR's. OR kids are stagnant scine their creativity is low after years of coaching to play robotically.
Watched OR alot this weekend. This is exactly what’s wrong with hockey in Canada. A coach who plays systems, shortens the bench (in exhibition games, lmao) just to win. Based on results this weekend, it’s not working. Zero creativity or individual development. Shame on you PO.
What type of system do they play? Does OR play similar to the Nats?

Some OR parents were smirking and saying that they've got 3 or 4 top players from the G ready to jump ship and join OR next year. If that was even true I hope those G parents watched the TM game and saw how much further ahead the development is in the G among top teams. It was a total destruction of OR. When out became obvious early that TM was all over the OR system and shutting it down OR coaches and kids had no response, they just kept feeding into TM hands over and over and over. Total robots who could not adjust.
Sounds like an unhappy OR parent. If you don’t like it, leave.
Guest

Re: 2011 AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 1:06 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 12:40 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 12:26 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 12:11 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 11:52 am
Guest wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 10:26 am

Did TM improve or did OR regress?
TM slight improvement. OR regress in relation to other teams. Most top team kids iq have improved so they can play well against a system like OR's. OR kids are stagnant scine their creativity is low after years of coaching to play robotically.
Watched OR alot this weekend. This is exactly what’s wrong with hockey in Canada. A coach who plays systems, shortens the bench (in exhibition games, lmao) just to win. Based on results this weekend, it’s not working. Zero creativity or individual development. Shame on you PO.
What type of system do they play? Does OR play similar to the Nats?

Some OR parents were smirking and saying that they've got 3 or 4 top players from the G ready to jump ship and join OR next year. If that was even true I hope those G parents watched the TM game and saw how much further ahead the development is in the G among top teams. It was a total destruction of OR. When out became obvious early that TM was all over the OR system and shutting it down OR coaches and kids had no response, they just kept feeding into TM hands over and over and over. Total robots who could not adjust.
Sounds like an unhappy OR parent. If you don’t like it, leave.
G parents know their options. What reason would they go play for a system development team in the OMHA?
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “2004 And Younger”