Minor Hockey Talks - Hockey Forum

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 3:13 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 2:58 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 2:51 pm who does that?? just move on. its even worse that is was part of the coaching staff for both situations. I'm sure each of them knew what was going on wasn't hard to have proof

Mature people move on. Little children squabble

Parent coaches. Lol

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 5:37 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 3:13 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 2:58 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 2:51 pm who does that?? just move on. its even worse that is was part of the coaching staff for both situations. I'm sure each of them knew what was going on wasn't hard to have proof

Mature people move on. Little children squabble

Parent coaches. Lol

Parent coaches can be the best kind, especially at the A level. if you get the right one they will care about the team at a level that no paid coach can. But, there is good and bad. If you are laughing at the thought of a parent coach then you really know nothing about hockey. Whether the coach is paid or a parent or both gives zero indication on whether they are good or bad. Some of the absolute worst coaches I have experienced have been paid "pros" who can run some good drills but suck at all the rest. These types are better at being hired trainers than running a team. This doesn't mean I don't want the technical
ability but to judge someone based on limited info like "parent coach" or "paid coach" is the height of ignorance.

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 6:01 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 5:37 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 3:13 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 2:58 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 2:51 pm who does that?? just move on. its even worse that is was part of the coaching staff for both situations. I'm sure each of them knew what was going on wasn't hard to have proof

Mature people move on. Little children squabble

Parent coaches. Lol

Parent coaches can be the best kind, especially at the A level. if you get the right one they will care about the team at a level that no paid coach can. But, there is good and bad. If you are laughing at the thought of a parent coach then you really know nothing about hockey. Whether the coach is paid or a parent or both gives zero indication on whether they are good or bad. Some of the absolute worst coaches I have experienced have been paid "pros" who can run some good drills but suck at all the rest. These types are better at being hired trainers than running a team. This doesn't mean I don't want the technical
ability but to judge someone based on limited info like "parent coach" or "paid coach" is the height of ignorance.

this sounds right parent coaches can be top notch and paid coaches can be top notch

and visa versa

but parent coaches run into situations where their kid is the best or worst on the team or is favoured or his friends are favoured and it can get dicey with ice time and preferences and lines

the best mix is a paid coach or trainer with a good parent group to support the coach and help run the team

and all of this doesnt matter if the kids are miserable or do not get along or do not have chemistry

off the ice stuff makes a difference in hockey

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 6:16 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 6:01 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 5:37 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 3:13 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 2:58 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 2:51 pm who does that?? just move on. its even worse that is was part of the coaching staff for both situations. I'm sure each of them knew what was going on wasn't hard to have proof

Mature people move on. Little children squabble

Parent coaches. Lol

Parent coaches can be the best kind, especially at the A level. if you get the right one they will care about the team at a level that no paid coach can. But, there is good and bad. If you are laughing at the thought of a parent coach then you really know nothing about hockey. Whether the coach is paid or a parent or both gives zero indication on whether they are good or bad. Some of the absolute worst coaches I have experienced have been paid "pros" who can run some good drills but suck at all the rest. These types are better at being hired trainers than running a team. This doesn't mean I don't want the technical
ability but to judge someone based on limited info like "parent coach" or "paid coach" is the height of ignorance.

this sounds right parent coaches can be top notch and paid coaches can be top notch

and visa versa

but parent coaches run into situations where their kid is the best or worst on the team or is favoured or his friends are favoured and it can get dicey with ice time and preferences and lines

the best mix is a paid coach or trainer with a good parent group to support the coach and help run the team

and all of this doesnt matter if the kids are miserable or do not get along or do not have chemistry

off the ice stuff makes a difference in hockey

All kids should get about equal ice time in A. If that's not the case the coach is a loser. The only time it should be equal is when there is a big team opportunity like a must win game to get into the playoffs or a tourney final when the game is close in the third. Any A coach shortening then each every game is a low life. Any parent supporting this is also a loser. It's A hockey, it's not life or death.

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 6:17 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 6:16 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 6:01 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 5:37 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 3:13 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 2:58 pm

Mature people move on. Little children squabble

Parent coaches. Lol

Parent coaches can be the best kind, especially at the A level. if you get the right one they will care about the team at a level that no paid coach can. But, there is good and bad. If you are laughing at the thought of a parent coach then you really know nothing about hockey. Whether the coach is paid or a parent or both gives zero indication on whether they are good or bad. Some of the absolute worst coaches I have experienced have been paid "pros" who can run some good drills but suck at all the rest. These types are better at being hired trainers than running a team. This doesn't mean I don't want the technical
ability but to judge someone based on limited info like "parent coach" or "paid coach" is the height of ignorance.

this sounds right parent coaches can be top notch and paid coaches can be top notch

and visa versa

but parent coaches run into situations where their kid is the best or worst on the team or is favoured or his friends are favoured and it can get dicey with ice time and preferences and lines

the best mix is a paid coach or trainer with a good parent group to support the coach and help run the team

and all of this doesnt matter if the kids are miserable or do not get along or do not have chemistry

off the ice stuff makes a difference in hockey

All kids should get about equal ice time in A. If that's not the case the coach is a loser. The only time it should be equal is when there is a big team opportunity like a must win game to get into the playoffs or a tourney final when the game is close in the third. Any A coach shortening then each every game is a low life. Any parent supporting this is also a loser. It's A hockey, it's not life or death.

Shorten during special circumstances otherwise roll the damn lines.

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 5:57 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 3:13 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 2:58 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 2:51 pm who does that?? just move on. its even worse that is was part of the coaching staff for both situations. I'm sure each of them knew what was going on wasn't hard to have proof

Mature people move on. Little children squabble

Parent coaches. Lol

well hopefully the kids who were cut were told on a timely basis so they could find another team (likely attend another teams birthday skate). If they were cut late on with little chance of finding another team, as a parent I might be upset. More to this than told here I think.

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 6:01 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 5:37 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 3:13 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 2:58 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 2:51 pm who does that?? just move on. its even worse that is was part of the coaching staff for both situations. I'm sure each of them knew what was going on wasn't hard to have proof

Mature people move on. Little children squabble

Parent coaches. Lol

Parent coaches can be the best kind, especially at the A level. if you get the right one they will care about the team at a level that no paid coach can. But, there is good and bad. If you are laughing at the thought of a parent coach then you really know nothing about hockey. Whether the coach is paid or a parent or both gives zero indication on whether they are good or bad. Some of the absolute worst coaches I have experienced have been paid "pros" who can run some good drills but suck at all the rest. These types are better at being hired trainers than running a team. This doesn't mean I don't want the technical
ability but to judge someone based on limited info like "parent coach" or "paid coach" is the height of ignorance.

this sounds right parent coaches can be top notch and paid coaches can be top notch

and visa versa

but parent coaches run into situations where their kid is the best or worst on the team or is favoured or his friends are favoured and it can get dicey with ice time and preferences and lines

the best mix is a paid coach or trainer with a good parent group to support the coach and help run the team

and all of this doesnt matter if the kids are miserable or do not get along or do not have chemistry

off the ice stuff makes a difference in hockey

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 10:22 pm Does anyone have any info on changes made by Aeros, York Mills and Leaside?