A new place to talk about minor hockey in North America & Around the World. Jump in to the Minor Hockey Talk forum and discuss everything about Hockey in Canada & Hockey in the USA
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 9:45 am
GTHL announces 2024 Top Prospects Game.
40 GTHL Under-16 ‘AAA’ players go head-to-head.
How many players on this list don't play for VK, TM, NYR and JRC?
MR will have 2-3 I think.
MM will have some. 2-3. Maybe more
DMF with 1 or 2.
Pretty much it I think.
Oh boy
Can’t wait to hear the parents of kids who aren’t selected and all the conspiracy theories that will be attached
But what is the selection process? If you were to select two teams out of the top goal scorers? Maybe looked at the +/-. Would that be enough? Just take the sleaze and the money out of it. Straight numbers. It wouldn't perfect but it would better than what is going to be revealed, I am sure.
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 9:45 am
GTHL announces 2024 Top Prospects Game.
40 GTHL Under-16 ‘AAA’ players go head-to-head.
How many players on this list don't play for VK, TM, NYR and JRC?
MR will have 2-3 I think.
MM will have some. 2-3. Maybe more
DMF with 1 or 2.
Pretty much it I think.
Oh boy
Can’t wait to hear the parents of kids who aren’t selected and all the conspiracy theories that will be attached
But what is the selection process? If you were to select two teams out of the top goal scorers? Maybe looked at the +/-. Would that be enough? Just take the sleaze and the money out of it. Straight numbers. It wouldn't perfect but it would better than what is going to be revealed, I am sure.
Totally agree
So just so we are clear Tm win 6-4 with empty netter and DMF had 6 09s playing. lol
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 9:45 am
GTHL announces 2024 Top Prospects Game.
40 GTHL Under-16 ‘AAA’ players go head-to-head.
How many players on this list don't play for VK, TM, NYR and JRC?
MR will have 2-3 I think.
MM will have some. 2-3. Maybe more
DMF with 1 or 2.
Pretty much it I think.
Oh boy
Can’t wait to hear the parents of kids who aren’t selected and all the conspiracy theories that will be attached
But what is the selection process? If you were to select two teams out of the top goal scorers? Maybe looked at the +/-. Would that be enough? Just take the sleaze and the money out of it. Straight numbers. It wouldn't perfect but it would better than what is going to be revealed, I am sure.
Totally agree
So just so we are clear Tm win 6-4 with empty netter and DMF had 6 09s playing. lol
WTF does that have to do with anything? Without #11, TM is mediocre at best
MR will have 2-3 I think.
MM will have some. 2-3. Maybe more
DMF with 1 or 2.
Pretty much it I think.
Oh boy
Can’t wait to hear the parents of kids who aren’t selected and all the conspiracy theories that will be attached
But what is the selection process? If you were to select two teams out of the top goal scorers? Maybe looked at the +/-. Would that be enough? Just take the sleaze and the money out of it. Straight numbers. It wouldn't perfect but it would better than what is going to be revealed, I am sure.
Totally agree
So just so we are clear Tm win 6-4 with empty netter and DMF had 6 09s playing. lol
WTF does that have to do with anything? Without #11, TM is mediocre at best
Oh boy
Can’t wait to hear the parents of kids who aren’t selected and all the conspiracy theories that will be attached
But what is the selection process? If you were to select two teams out of the top goal scorers? Maybe looked at the +/-. Would that be enough? Just take the sleaze and the money out of it. Straight numbers. It wouldn't perfect but it would better than what is going to be revealed, I am sure.
Totally agree
So just so we are clear Tm win 6-4 with empty netter and DMF had 6 09s playing. lol
WTF does that have to do with anything? Without #11, TM is mediocre at best
Oh boy
Can’t wait to hear the parents of kids who aren’t selected and all the conspiracy theories that will be attached
But what is the selection process? If you were to select two teams out of the top goal scorers? Maybe looked at the +/-. Would that be enough? Just take the sleaze and the money out of it. Straight numbers. It wouldn't perfect but it would better than what is going to be revealed, I am sure.
Totally agree
So just so we are clear Tm win 6-4 with empty netter and DMF had 6 09s playing. lol
WTF does that have to do with anything? Without #11, TM is mediocre at best
6 09s that’s crazy
09 loop is much much stronger than the weak 08 group.
But what is the selection process? If you were to select two teams out of the top goal scorers? Maybe looked at the +/-. Would that be enough? Just take the sleaze and the money out of it. Straight numbers. It wouldn't perfect but it would better than what is going to be revealed, I am sure.
Totally agree
So just so we are clear Tm win 6-4 with empty netter and DMF had 6 09s playing. lol
WTF does that have to do with anything? Without #11, TM is mediocre at best
6 09s that’s crazy
09 loop is much much stronger than the weak 08 group.
That is factually innacurate. The 08 loop is the first age group in DECADES that wont feature a top 10 scorer playing a year up. DECADES. Not on D, F or goalie is there a single 09 making a difference thats how DEEEP 2008's are. EVERY AGE other age group before this and younger then this year is littered with players near the top playing up a year.
So just so we are clear Tm win 6-4 with empty netter and DMF had 6 09s playing. lol
WTF does that have to do with anything? Without #11, TM is mediocre at best
6 09s that’s crazy
09 loop is much much stronger than the weak 08 group.
That is factually innacurate. The 08 loop is the first age group in DECADES that wont feature a top 10 scorer playing a year up. DECADES. Not on D, F or goalie is there a single 09 making a difference thats how DEEEP 2008's are. EVERY AGE other age group before this and younger then this year is littered with players near the top playing up a year.
No. Every09 that plays up is better than half the team depending on the team. Give your head a shake. 6 09s almost beat the first place team in 08
So just so we are clear Tm win 6-4 with empty netter and DMF had 6 09s playing. lol
WTF does that have to do with anything? Without #11, TM is mediocre at best
6 09s that’s crazy
09 loop is much much stronger than the weak 08 group.
That is factually innacurate. The 08 loop is the first age group in DECADES that wont feature a top 10 scorer playing a year up. DECADES. Not on D, F or goalie is there a single 09 making a difference thats how DEEEP 2008's are. EVERY AGE other age group before this and younger then this year is littered with players near the top playing up a year.
No. Every09 that plays up is better than half the team depending on the team. Give your head a shake. 6 09s almost beat the first place team in 08
Then stay there and see how that works out in the end. The same result was said, and I'll repeat, NO 2009 will ever be in any 2008 top scorer list, not reg season, not tourney not OHL cup. It will be the only year we see this in our lifetime because the 08 loop is too deep.
So just so we are clear Tm win 6-4 with empty netter and DMF had 6 09s playing. lol
WTF does that have to do with anything? Without #11, TM is mediocre at best
6 09s that’s crazy
09 loop is much much stronger than the weak 08 group.
That is factually innacurate. The 08 loop is the first age group in DECADES that wont feature a top 10 scorer playing a year up. DECADES. Not on D, F or goalie is there a single 09 making a difference thats how DEEEP 2008's are. EVERY AGE other age group before this and younger then this year is littered with players near the top playing up a year.
No. Every09 that plays up is better than half the team depending on the team. Give your head a shake. 6 09s almost beat the first place team in 08
Every player who plays up is better than half the existing team - that's why they play up. What the 09s don't have is an elite player who is better than everyone on the 08 team.