Guest wrote: ↑Sun Sep 17, 2023 6:05 pmNot good enough for the CCHL you make me laught some of them are playing at a better level.not sure why some try to reason with this dad he's bitter and frustratedGuest wrote: ↑Sun Sep 17, 2023 6:01 pmIf you know so much about hockey and the story behind all the players I'm sure you can figure this task out. For those committed you just have to look at the commitment site to see who is going where again not hard to figure out.Guest wrote: ↑Sun Sep 17, 2023 4:56 pmGuest wrote: ↑Sun Sep 17, 2023 2:11 pmIf we are talking about 2006 players that got drafted in the O at the priority draft and are playing in the CCHL OJS has one Nepean has one and CP has one. The players who were drafted and that could play in the CCHL but decided to leave and not to play in the CCHL Renfrew has two, OJS has one, Navan has one, Kemptville has two, Nepean has two and Brockville has one. Four of those players have commitments and decide to develop elsewhere. The rest are signed in the O and are either playing or playing on the affiliated teams. I could be missing a few but all those players were develop by HEO. To recap three have stayed and nine have left. That's on the CCHL pushing local players away and not trying to attract them to stay. But I'm sure you will argue that none of this is true and just fabricationGuest wrote: ↑Sun Sep 17, 2023 12:06 pmThe HEO doesn't develop players, it's HEO's job. Player development needs to happen LONG before a player ever gets to be available to the CCHL. LONG BEFORE. HEO has them for 9-12 years "before" the CCHL. It's in that time frame that player development occurs. If a player can't skate well enough, handle the puck well enough, shoot well enough, etc. that's not on the CCHL it's on HEO-all day long.Guest wrote: ↑Sun Sep 17, 2023 11:08 am
The CCHL had 8 years to develop U6,U17 and U18 players and they failed. The number of HEO players in the CCHL dropped by 20% under the CCHL development pathway. Get your facts straight.
Give initials or player numbers.
Why won't you address your 20% claim?!?!?! BS right.
I already know I'm right.
You "may" have players who went elsewhere, so what. You don't know why. What we do know is, they weren't good enough for the CCHL.
Also, some commitments, like RW who had left, if you believe it was based in merit, I have a bridge to sell you. Same with AS.
You also need some education on who and why players get committed, must be because you have not been through the process oh yeah right I remember lots of ppl are looking at your kid lol
Which "better" level are you referring to?
Or do you just like to be mysterious.