Minor Hockey Talks - Hockey Forum

Is a five-game suspension in the OHL too harsh for non-hate-based trash talk? The recent suspension of Landon Sim for calling an opponent Mennonite has sparked debate. While the OHL's intention to curb harmful language is commendable, is a blanket five-game suspension suitable for all infractions? Where do we draw the line between unacceptable slurs and on-ice chirping? Does the severity of the punishment discourage players from engaging in any form of verbal sparring, even playful banter? What are the potential long-term effects of such strict enforcement on player development and the overall atmosphere of the game? This incident has opened a Pandora's Box, raising questions about the evolving culture of hockey and the need for a more nuanced approach to language violations. I predict we will see a revised OHL policy soon, one that differentiates between hateful slurs and less serious trash talk. What do you think? Share your experiences and opinions on this complex issue.

I know the Mennonite’s in the London area couldn’t understand why someone would get a suspension for it. I also think when Sim got the penalty earlier in the year for calling the player a Not allowed and got 5 games while the player in question had actually threatened bodily harm (son of the OHL Director of Referees) got nothing - in the real world off the ice you could be arrested. The hockey world was a buzz wondering if the OHL had lost their minds. Check out YouTube “The OHL is a Joke”. I truly believe a review is required or we are going to have players not wanting to join the CHL. Use some common sense.