2015 AAA

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Fri May 17, 2024 2:24 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:08 pm Have any of the scumbag parents been identified in this loop yet?

Yeah

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Fri May 17, 2024 2:26 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:07 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 1:43 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 10:19 am
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 10:11 am
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 10:04 am
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 10:00 am

How do you know this is the team if you state it’s been the team for last couple of years because the 2015 AAA Waxers just got out together now.
It's probably the team.
Standing from previous tournaments? Are they playing at Elite, AAA or AA?
They've played tier 1 Canlan tournaments the last two years. Often among the top teams. This year a couple weeks ago they were up 3-1 on the Nats early, then lost the game. They're right there with the mid pack G teams. So usually that means upper pack OMHA.
Lol fake news...

Mid pack G teams are absolutely not = to upper pack OMHA.

MAYBE at the older ages U10, U11, U12 they are about equal. Waxers are a mid-pack team for sure.
Exactly. Mid pack G is equal to mid pack OMHA not upper OmHA teams.

This year DMF was mid pack G at u10. They would absolutely be a top 3 OMHA team.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Fri May 17, 2024 2:38 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:26 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:07 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 1:43 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 10:19 am
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 10:11 am
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 10:04 am

It's probably the team.
Standing from previous tournaments? Are they playing at Elite, AAA or AA?
They've played tier 1 Canlan tournaments the last two years. Often among the top teams. This year a couple weeks ago they were up 3-1 on the Nats early, then lost the game. They're right there with the mid pack G teams. So usually that means upper pack OMHA.
Lol fake news...

Mid pack G teams are absolutely not = to upper pack OMHA.

MAYBE at the older ages U10, U11, U12 they are about equal. Waxers are a mid-pack team for sure.
Exactly. Mid pack G is equal to mid pack OMHA not upper OmHA teams.
This year DMF was mid pack G at u10. They would absolutely be a top 3 OMHA team.

Not a chance. Also, with KSLs best teams feeding into OMHA you will see those teams start to become better at the younger ages than the G teams.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Fri May 17, 2024 2:42 pm

Markham has no KSL teams nor kids playing in KSL. This is why rating a Markham team so high doesn’t make sense.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Fri May 17, 2024 2:52 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:42 pm Markham has no KSL teams nor kids playing in KSL. This is why rating a Markham team so high doesn’t make sense.

Especially in U10.

Over the span of the year, you might see that the kids had unlaying talent all along, but, it will take them a while to catch up to the other kids. So you just need to hope that the kids catch up quickly before the other kids continue their development path starting further along.

So are they going to be set up for success or what? Do they have top notch coaching? Are they going to be given access to top notch power skating and skill development? Are the kids going to be the type of kids to go "above and beyond" team training to do their own stuff?

time will tell. Stouffville MD and Markham MD programs both looked average at best when I saw them. So its not like they were even the best of the best in MD either.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Fri May 17, 2024 3:11 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:38 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:26 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:07 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 1:43 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 10:19 am
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 10:11 am

Standing from previous tournaments? Are they playing at Elite, AAA or AA?
They've played tier 1 Canlan tournaments the last two years. Often among the top teams. This year a couple weeks ago they were up 3-1 on the Nats early, then lost the game. They're right there with the mid pack G teams. So usually that means upper pack OMHA.
Lol fake news...

Mid pack G teams are absolutely not = to upper pack OMHA.

MAYBE at the older ages U10, U11, U12 they are about equal. Waxers are a mid-pack team for sure.
Exactly. Mid pack G is equal to mid pack OMHA not upper OmHA teams.
This year DMF was mid pack G at u10. They would absolutely be a top 3 OMHA team.
Not a chance. Also, with KSLs best teams feeding into OMHA you will see those teams start to become better at the younger ages than the G teams.

The DMF comment is correct … further context Nats 2014 just beat Quinte 7-1 Nats finished 3rd/4th in the season. Quinte was tops

DMF would destroy WW or Barrie.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Fri May 17, 2024 3:15 pm

Certain OMHA orgs prefer to keep it family and friends so they do t care about being a top team.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Fri May 17, 2024 3:19 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:42 pm Markham has no KSL teams nor kids playing in KSL. This is why rating a Markham team so high doesn’t make sense.

Again this team literally just played the 2015 Nats and were up 3-1 at one point in the game. So unless you're saying the Nats are garbage, sit this one out.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Fri May 17, 2024 3:21 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 3:11 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:38 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:26 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:07 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 1:43 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 10:19 am

They've played tier 1 Canlan tournaments the last two years. Often among the top teams. This year a couple weeks ago they were up 3-1 on the Nats early, then lost the game. They're right there with the mid pack G teams. So usually that means upper pack OMHA.
Lol fake news...

Mid pack G teams are absolutely not = to upper pack OMHA.

MAYBE at the older ages U10, U11, U12 they are about equal. Waxers are a mid-pack team for sure.
Exactly. Mid pack G is equal to mid pack OMHA not upper OmHA teams.
This year DMF was mid pack G at u10. They would absolutely be a top 3 OMHA team.
Not a chance. Also, with KSLs best teams feeding into OMHA you will see those teams start to become better at the younger ages than the G teams.
The DMF comment is correct … further context Nats 2014 just beat Quinte 7-1 Nats finished 3rd/4th in the season. Quinte was tops

DMF would destroy WW or Barrie.

It really is a fact that mid pack G means upper pack OMHA. Anyone who thinks otherwise is an OMHAer with an inferiority complex.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Fri May 17, 2024 3:27 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:52 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2024 2:42 pm Markham has no KSL teams nor kids playing in KSL. This is why rating a Markham team so high doesn’t make sense.
Especially in U10.

Over the span of the year, you might see that the kids had unlaying talent all along, but, it will take them a while to catch up to the other kids. So you just need to hope that the kids catch up quickly before the other kids continue their development path starting further along.

So are they going to be set up for success or what? Do they have top notch coaching? Are they going to be given access to top notch power skating and skill development? Are the kids going to be the type of kids to go "above and beyond" team training to do their own stuff?

time will tell. Stouffville MD and Markham MD programs both looked average at best when I saw them. So its not like they were even the best of the best in MD either.

Not quite. It’s also kids who are athletic and play another complimentary sport such as baseball or lacrosse.there are studies on this. Kids who can play with confidence and have mental toughness. And then it also all changes when checking starts.

Minor Hockey Talks - Hockey Forum

2015 AAA

Re: 2015 AAA

Re: 2015 AAA

Re: 2015 AAA

Re: 2015 AAA

Re: 2015 AAA

Re: 2015 AAA

Re: 2015 AAA

Re: 2015 AAA

Re: 2015 AAA

Re: 2015 AAA