by Guest » Thu Jun 27, 2024 7:44 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 2:36 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 1:16 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 12:57 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 12:51 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:37 am
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:11 am
The kid who scored 2 is from their team, as far as I know
This guy is trolling. Both scorers are VK players.
Totally false you can look that up online. All three goals scored by MM players for next year.
They were all MM kids who scored , don't be a scared that MM is going to be a top team!
Bahahaha top team? Just shows everyone that the reps are weaker than expected. MM have some of the most toxic parents around. It’s only of time before things go from bad to worse.
I wouldn't call their parents toxic. Except shouting female, coach's relative, one of their gk parents and new kids's father who is sticky like a chewing gum all the rest are ok. Nats are much worse in that relation.
MM's main problem is the coach who seems to be more interested in cash rather than team development and too few bright kids, At best they have 5 strong players with good potential, more realistically- 3, who won't be in the team in a year.
As for Reps, their main problem is that the coach can't say no to parents he is comfortable with. He chose good team atmosphere with known kids and parents instead of high performance. Maybe his tactics will work in the long run.
Healthy atmosphere is more than half the battle. Just like with everything else it starts at the top. A coach who talks trash, is unfair and fosters a toxic bench will breed a toxic team and toxic parent group. Make no mistake. You can see the coaches who are genuine, authentic and really want what’s best for the team. Those are the good ones. Those will be the ones you remember and hold in high esteem. Role models.
[quote=Guest post_id=128630 time=1719513407]
[quote=Guest post_id=128621 time=1719508592]
[quote=Guest post_id=128616 time=1719507429]
[quote=Guest post_id=128615 time=1719507096]
[quote=Guest post_id=128600 time=1719499055]
[quote=Guest post_id=128597 time=1719497491]
The kid who scored 2 is from their team, as far as I know
[/quote]
This guy is trolling. Both scorers are VK players.
[/quote]
Totally false you can look that up online. All three goals scored by MM players for next year.
[/quote]
They were all MM kids who scored , don't be a scared that MM is going to be a top team!
[/quote]
Bahahaha top team? Just shows everyone that the reps are weaker than expected. MM have some of the most toxic parents around. It’s only of time before things go from bad to worse.
[/quote]
I wouldn't call their parents toxic. Except shouting female, coach's relative, one of their gk parents and new kids's father who is sticky like a chewing gum all the rest are ok. Nats are much worse in that relation.
MM's main problem is the coach who seems to be more interested in cash rather than team development and too few bright kids, At best they have 5 strong players with good potential, more realistically- 3, who won't be in the team in a year.
As for Reps, their main problem is that the coach can't say no to parents he is comfortable with. He chose good team atmosphere with known kids and parents instead of high performance. Maybe his tactics will work in the long run.
[/quote]
Healthy atmosphere is more than half the battle. Just like with everything else it starts at the top. A coach who talks trash, is unfair and fosters a toxic bench will breed a toxic team and toxic parent group. Make no mistake. You can see the coaches who are genuine, authentic and really want what’s best for the team. Those are the good ones. Those will be the ones you remember and hold in high esteem. Role models.